From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wg0-f52.google.com (mail-wg0-f52.google.com [74.125.82.52]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CE0F6B0036 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2014 04:39:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-wg0-f52.google.com with SMTP id a1so5310599wgh.35 for ; Sat, 02 Aug 2014 01:39:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jenni1.inet.fi (mta-out1.inet.fi. [62.71.2.193]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id dw12si23839805wjb.138.2014.08.02.01.39.37 for ; Sat, 02 Aug 2014 01:39:37 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2014 11:39:29 +0300 From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] faultaround updates Message-ID: <20140802083929.GA17045@node.dhcp.inet.fi> References: <1406893869-32739-1-git-send-email-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: David Rientjes Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Andrew Morton , Dave Hansen , Andrey Ryabinin , Sasha Levin , linux-mm@kvack.org On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 02:32:36PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote: > On Fri, 1 Aug 2014, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > > One fix and one tweak for faultaround code. > > > > As alternative, we could just drop debugfs interface and make > > fault_around_bytes constant. > > > > If we can remove the debugfs interface, then it seems better than > continuing to support it. Any objections to removing it? Andrew asked it initially. Up to him. -- Kirill A. Shutemov -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org