From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 2/4] mm: memcontrol: add memory.current and memory.high to default hierarchy
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2014 15:36:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140807133614.GC12730@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1407186897-21048-3-git-send-email-hannes@cmpxchg.org>
On Mon 04-08-14 17:14:55, Johannes Weiner wrote:
[...]
> @@ -132,6 +137,19 @@ u64 res_counter_uncharge(struct res_counter *counter, unsigned long val);
> u64 res_counter_uncharge_until(struct res_counter *counter,
> struct res_counter *top,
> unsigned long val);
> +
> +static inline unsigned long long res_counter_high(struct res_counter *cnt)
soft limit used res_counter_soft_limit_excess which has quite a long
name but at least those two should be consistent.
I will post two helper patches which I have used to make this and other
operations on res counter easier as a reply to this.
> +{
> + unsigned long long high = 0;
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&cnt->lock, flags);
> + if (cnt->usage > cnt->high)
> + high = cnt->usage - cnt->high;
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cnt->lock, flags);
> + return high;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * res_counter_margin - calculate chargeable space of a counter
> * @cnt: the counter
> @@ -193,6 +211,17 @@ static inline void res_counter_reset_failcnt(struct res_counter *cnt)
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cnt->lock, flags);
> }
>
> +static inline int res_counter_set_high(struct res_counter *cnt,
> + unsigned long long high)
> +{
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&cnt->lock, flags);
> + cnt->high = high;
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cnt->lock, flags);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
[...]
> @@ -2541,16 +2541,16 @@ retry:
> goto done;
>
> size = batch * PAGE_SIZE;
> - if (!res_counter_charge(&memcg->res, size, &fail_res)) {
> + if (!res_counter_charge(&memcg->res, size, &res)) {
> if (!do_swap_account)
> goto done_restock;
> - if (!res_counter_charge(&memcg->memsw, size, &fail_res))
> + if (!res_counter_charge(&memcg->memsw, size, &res))
> goto done_restock;
> res_counter_uncharge(&memcg->res, size);
> - mem_over_limit = mem_cgroup_from_res_counter(fail_res, memsw);
> + mem_over_limit = mem_cgroup_from_res_counter(res, memsw);
> flags |= MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_NOSWAP;
> } else
> - mem_over_limit = mem_cgroup_from_res_counter(fail_res, res);
> + mem_over_limit = mem_cgroup_from_res_counter(res, res);
>
> if (batch > nr_pages) {
> batch = nr_pages;
> @@ -2621,6 +2621,20 @@ bypass:
> done_restock:
> if (batch > nr_pages)
> refill_stock(memcg, batch - nr_pages);
> +
> + res = &memcg->res;
> + while (res) {
> + unsigned long long high = res_counter_high(res);
> +
> + if (high) {
> + unsigned long high_pages = high >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> + struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
> +
> + memcg = mem_cgroup_from_res_counter(res, res);
> + mem_cgroup_reclaim(memcg, high_pages, gfp_mask, 0);
> + }
> + res = res->parent;
> + }
> done:
> return ret;
> }
Why haven't you followed what we do for hard limit here? In my
implementation I have the following:
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index a37465fcd8ae..6a797c740ea5 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -2529,6 +2529,21 @@ static int memcg_cpu_hotplug_callback(struct notifier_block *nb,
return NOTIFY_OK;
}
+static bool high_limit_excess(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
+ struct mem_cgroup **memcg_over_limit)
+{
+ struct mem_cgroup *parent = memcg;
+
+ do {
+ if (res_counter_limit_excess(&parent->res, RES_HIGH_LIMIT)) {
+ *memcg_over_limit = parent;
+ return true;
+ }
+ } while ((parent = parent_mem_cgroup(parent)));
+
+ return false;
+}
+
static int try_charge(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp_mask,
unsigned int nr_pages)
{
@@ -2623,6 +2638,10 @@ bypass:
goto retry;
done_restock:
+ /* Throttle charger a bit if it is above high limit. */
+ if (high_limit_excess(memcg, &mem_over_limit))
+ mem_cgroup_reclaim(mem_over_limit, gfp_mask, flags);
+
if (batch > nr_pages)
refill_stock(memcg, batch - nr_pages);
done:
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-07 13:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-04 21:14 [patch 0/4] mm: memcontrol: populate unified hierarchy interface Johannes Weiner
2014-08-04 21:14 ` [patch 1/4] mm: memcontrol: reduce reclaim invocations for higher order requests Johannes Weiner
2014-08-07 13:08 ` Michal Hocko
2014-08-07 15:31 ` Johannes Weiner
2014-08-07 16:10 ` Greg Thelen
2014-08-08 12:47 ` Michal Hocko
2014-08-08 12:32 ` Michal Hocko
2014-08-08 13:26 ` Johannes Weiner
2014-08-11 7:49 ` Michal Hocko
2014-08-13 14:59 ` Michal Hocko
2014-08-13 20:41 ` Johannes Weiner
2014-08-14 16:12 ` Michal Hocko
2014-08-04 21:14 ` [patch 2/4] mm: memcontrol: add memory.current and memory.high to default hierarchy Johannes Weiner
2014-08-07 13:36 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2014-08-07 13:39 ` Michal Hocko
2014-08-07 15:47 ` Johannes Weiner
2014-08-04 21:14 ` [patch 3/4] mm: memcontrol: add memory.max " Johannes Weiner
2014-08-04 21:14 ` [patch 4/4] mm: memcontrol: add memory.vmstat " Johannes Weiner
2014-08-05 12:40 ` [patch 0/4] mm: memcontrol: populate unified hierarchy interface Michal Hocko
2014-08-05 13:53 ` Johannes Weiner
2014-08-05 15:27 ` Michal Hocko
2014-08-07 14:21 ` Johannes Weiner
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-08-08 21:38 [patch 0/4] mm: memcontrol: populate unified hierarchy interface v2 Johannes Weiner
2014-08-08 21:38 ` [patch 2/4] mm: memcontrol: add memory.current and memory.high to default hierarchy Johannes Weiner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140807133614.GC12730@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).