From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qg0-f49.google.com (mail-qg0-f49.google.com [209.85.192.49]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB85F6B0035 for ; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 05:30:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-qg0-f49.google.com with SMTP id j107so8183230qga.36 for ; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 02:30:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com (cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com. [217.140.96.50]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 81si20594305qgx.26.2014.08.11.02.30.27 for ; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 02:30:28 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 10:30:24 +0100 From: Will Deacon Subject: Re: [PATCHv6 0/5] DMA Atomic pool for arm64 Message-ID: <20140811093024.GF15344@arm.com> References: <1407529848-6806-1-git-send-email-lauraa@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1407529848-6806-1-git-send-email-lauraa@codeaurora.org> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Laura Abbott Cc: Catalin Marinas , Russell King , David Riley , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Ritesh Harjain , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Thierry Reding , Arnd Bergmann On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 09:30:48PM +0100, Laura Abbott wrote: > Hi, > > This is v6 of the series to add an atomic pool for arm64 and refactor some of > the arm dma_atomic code as well. > > Russell, assuming you have no issues I'd like to get your Acked-by before > Catalin picks this up. As always, testing and reviews are appreiciated. > > Thanks, > Laura > > > v6: Tweaked the commit text to clarify that arm is moving from > ioremap_page_range to map_vm_area and friends > > v5: v4: Addressed comments from Thierry and Catalin. Updated map_vm_area call in > dma_common_pages_remap since the API changed. > > v4: Simplified the logic in gen_pool_first_fit_order_align which makes the > data argument actually unused. > > v3: Now a patch series due to refactoring of arm code. arm and arm64 now both > use genalloc for atomic pool management. genalloc extensions added. > DMA remapping code factored out as well. > > v2: Various bug fixes pointed out by David and Ritesh (CMA dependency, swapping > coherent, noncoherent). I'm still not sure how to address the devicetree > suggestion by Will [1][2]. I added the devicetree mailing list this time around > to get more input on this. > > [1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-April/249180.html > [2] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-April/249528.html FWIW: I don't think the device-tree comments need to block this series. I was just curious as to why they weren't being used. Will -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org