From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>, Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: slub/debugobjects: lockup when freeing memory
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 19:31:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140820023121.GS4752@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1408192057200.32428@gentwo.org>
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 09:00:05PM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Aug 2014, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_DEBUG_XYZ
> >
> > If you make CONFIG_RCU_DEBUG_XYZ instead be CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_RCU_HEAD,
> > then it will automatically show up when it needs to.
>
> Ok.
>
> > The rest looks plausible, for whatever that is worth.
>
> We talked in the hallway about init_rcu_head not touching
> the contents of the rcu_head. If that is the case then we can simplify
> the patch.
That is correct -- the debug-objects code uses separate storage to track
states, and does not touch the memory to which the state applies.
> We could also remove the #ifdefs if init_rcu_head and destroy_rcu_head
> are no ops if CONFIG_DEBUG_RCU_HEAD is not defined.
And indeed they are, good point! It appears to me that both sets of
#ifdefs can go away.
Thanx, Paul
> Index: linux/mm/slub.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/mm/slub.c
> +++ linux/mm/slub.c
> @@ -1308,6 +1308,25 @@ static inline struct page *alloc_slab_pa
> return page;
> }
>
> +#define need_reserve_slab_rcu \
> + (sizeof(((struct page *)NULL)->lru) < sizeof(struct rcu_head))
> +
> +static struct rcu_head *get_rcu_head(struct kmem_cache *s, struct page *page)
> +{
> + if (need_reserve_slab_rcu) {
> + int order = compound_order(page);
> + int offset = (PAGE_SIZE << order) - s->reserved;
> +
> + VM_BUG_ON(s->reserved != sizeof(struct rcu_head));
> + return page_address(page) + offset;
> + } else {
> + /*
> + * RCU free overloads the RCU head over the LRU
> + */
> + return (void *)&page->lru;
> + }
> +}
> +
> static struct page *allocate_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, int node)
> {
> struct page *page;
> @@ -1357,6 +1376,22 @@ static struct page *allocate_slab(struct
> kmemcheck_mark_unallocated_pages(page, pages);
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_RCU_HEAD
> + if (unlikely(s->flags & SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU) && page)
> + /*
> + * Initialize various things. However, this init is
> + * not allowed to modify the contents of the rcu head.
> + * Allocations are permitted. However, the use of
> + * the same cache or another cache with SLAB_RCU_DESTROY
> + * set may cause additional recursions.
> + *
> + * So in order to be safe the slab caches used
> + * in init_rcu_head should be restricted to be of the
> + * non rcu kind only.
> + */
> + init_rcu_head(get_rcu_head(s, page));
> +#endif
> +
> if (flags & __GFP_WAIT)
> local_irq_disable();
> if (!page)
> @@ -1452,13 +1487,13 @@ static void __free_slab(struct kmem_cach
> memcg_uncharge_slab(s, order);
> }
>
> -#define need_reserve_slab_rcu \
> - (sizeof(((struct page *)NULL)->lru) < sizeof(struct rcu_head))
> -
> static void rcu_free_slab(struct rcu_head *h)
> {
> struct page *page;
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_RCU_HEAD
> + destroy_rcu_head(h);
> +#endif
> if (need_reserve_slab_rcu)
> page = virt_to_head_page(h);
> else
> @@ -1469,24 +1504,9 @@ static void rcu_free_slab(struct rcu_hea
>
> static void free_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, struct page *page)
> {
> - if (unlikely(s->flags & SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU)) {
> - struct rcu_head *head;
> -
> - if (need_reserve_slab_rcu) {
> - int order = compound_order(page);
> - int offset = (PAGE_SIZE << order) - s->reserved;
> -
> - VM_BUG_ON(s->reserved != sizeof(*head));
> - head = page_address(page) + offset;
> - } else {
> - /*
> - * RCU free overloads the RCU head over the LRU
> - */
> - head = (void *)&page->lru;
> - }
> -
> - call_rcu(head, rcu_free_slab);
> - } else
> + if (unlikely(s->flags & SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU))
> + call_rcu(get_rcu_head(s, page), rcu_free_slab);
> + else
> __free_slab(s, page);
> }
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-20 2:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-19 14:30 slub/debugobjects: lockup when freeing memory Sasha Levin
2014-06-19 15:03 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-06-19 16:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-06-19 19:29 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-19 20:19 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-06-19 20:28 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-19 20:36 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-18 16:37 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-19 3:44 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-08-19 3:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-20 2:00 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-08-20 2:31 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2014-08-20 6:01 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-08-20 12:19 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-06-19 20:29 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-06-19 20:32 ` Sasha Levin
2014-06-19 20:39 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-06-19 20:37 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-19 20:53 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-06-19 21:32 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-19 22:04 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-06-20 8:17 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-20 15:40 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-12 18:03 ` Sasha Levin
2014-07-12 19:33 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-06-20 14:30 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-06-19 20:42 ` Sasha Levin
2014-06-19 20:53 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140820023121.GS4752@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=sasha.levin@oracle.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).