From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 11/13] mm, compaction: skip buddy pages by their order in the migrate scanner
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 15:11:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140821151115.bcc66c15d53f7dc89d1b9b73@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1407142524-2025-12-git-send-email-vbabka@suse.cz>
On Mon, 4 Aug 2014 10:55:22 +0200 Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> wrote:
> The migration scanner skips PageBuddy pages, but does not consider their order
> as checking page_order() is generally unsafe without holding the zone->lock,
> and acquiring the lock just for the check wouldn't be a good tradeoff.
>
> Still, this could avoid some iterations over the rest of the buddy page, and
> if we are careful, the race window between PageBuddy() check and page_order()
> is small, and the worst thing that can happen is that we skip too much and miss
> some isolation candidates. This is not that bad, as compaction can already fail
> for many other reasons like parallel allocations, and those have much larger
> race window.
>
> This patch therefore makes the migration scanner obtain the buddy page order
> and use it to skip the whole buddy page, if the order appears to be in the
> valid range.
>
> It's important that the page_order() is read only once, so that the value used
> in the checks and in the pfn calculation is the same. But in theory the
> compiler can replace the local variable by multiple inlines of page_order().
> Therefore, the patch introduces page_order_unsafe() that uses ACCESS_ONCE to
> prevent this.
>
> Testing with stress-highalloc from mmtests shows a 15% reduction in number of
> pages scanned by migration scanner. The reduction is >60% with __GFP_NO_KSWAPD
> allocations, along with success rates better by few percent.
> This change is also a prerequisite for a later patch which is detecting when
> a cc->order block of pages contains non-buddy pages that cannot be isolated,
> and the scanner should thus skip to the next block immediately.
What is this "later patch"? Or is the changelog stale?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-21 22:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-04 8:55 [PATCH v6 00/13] compaction: balancing overhead and success rates Vlastimil Babka
2014-08-04 8:55 ` [PATCH v6 01/13] mm, THP: don't hold mmap_sem in khugepaged when allocating THP Vlastimil Babka
2014-08-04 8:55 ` [PATCH v6 02/13] mm, compaction: defer each zone individually instead of preferred zone Vlastimil Babka
2014-08-04 8:55 ` [PATCH v6 03/13] mm, compaction: do not count compact_stall if all zones skipped compaction Vlastimil Babka
2014-08-04 8:55 ` [PATCH v6 04/13] mm, compaction: do not recheck suitable_migration_target under lock Vlastimil Babka
2014-08-04 8:55 ` [PATCH v6 05/13] mm, compaction: move pageblock checks up from isolate_migratepages_range() Vlastimil Babka
2014-09-29 7:50 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-09-29 8:15 ` Vlastimil Babka
2014-08-04 8:55 ` [PATCH v6 06/13] mm, compaction: reduce zone checking frequency in the migration scanner Vlastimil Babka
2014-08-04 8:55 ` [PATCH v6 07/13] mm, compaction: khugepaged should not give up due to need_resched() Vlastimil Babka
2014-08-04 8:55 ` [PATCH v6 08/13] mm, compaction: periodically drop lock and restore IRQs in scanners Vlastimil Babka
2014-08-04 8:55 ` [PATCH v6 09/13] mm, compaction: skip rechecks when lock was already held Vlastimil Babka
2014-08-04 8:55 ` [PATCH v6 10/13] mm, compaction: remember position within pageblock in free pages scanner Vlastimil Babka
2014-08-04 8:55 ` [PATCH v6 11/13] mm, compaction: skip buddy pages by their order in the migrate scanner Vlastimil Babka
2014-08-21 22:11 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2014-09-08 8:04 ` Vlastimil Babka
2014-08-04 8:55 ` [PATCH v6 12/13] mm: rename allocflags_to_migratetype for clarity Vlastimil Babka
2014-08-04 8:55 ` [PATCH v6 13/13] mm, compaction: pass gfp mask to compact_control Vlastimil Babka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140821151115.bcc66c15d53f7dc89d1b9b73@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mina86@mina86.com \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).