linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Han Pingtian <hanpt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>, Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Improve slab consumption with memoryless nodes
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 18:10:11 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140822011011.GF13999@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140814001301.GI11121@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On 13.08.2014 [17:13:01 -0700], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> Anton noticed (http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mm/msg67489.html) that
> on ppc LPARs with memoryless nodes, a large amount of memory was
> consumed by slabs and was marked unreclaimable. He tracked it down to
> slab deactivations in the SLUB core when we allocate remotely, leading
> to poor efficiency always when memoryless nodes are present.
> 
> After much discussion, Joonsoo provided a few patches that help
> significantly. They don't resolve the problem altogether:
> 
>  - memory hotplug still needs testing, that is when a memoryless node
>    becomes memory-ful, we want to dtrt
>  - there are other reasons for going off-node than memoryless nodes,
>    e.g., fully exhausted local nodes
> 
> Neither case is resolved with this series, but I don't think that should
> block their acceptance, as they can be explored/resolved with follow-on
> patches.
> 
> The series consists of:
> 
> [1/4] topology: add support for node_to_mem_node() to determine the fallback node
> [2/4] slub: fallback to node_to_mem_node() node if allocating on memoryless node
> 
>  - Joonsoo's patches to cache the nearest node with memory for each
>    NUMA node
> 
> [3/4] Partial revert of 81c98869faa5 (""kthread: ensure locality of task_struct allocations")
> 
>  - At Tejun's request, keep the knowledge of memoryless node fallback to
>    the allocator core.
> 
> [4/4] powerpc: reorder per-cpu NUMA information's initialization
> 
>  - Fix what appears to be a bug with when the NUMA topology information
>    is stored in the powerpc initialization code.

Andrew & others,

I know kernel summit is going on, so I'll be patient, but was just
curious if anyone had any further comments other than Christoph's on the
naming.

Thanks,
Nish

> 
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c | 12 ++++++------
>  arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c    | 13 ++++++++++---
>  include/linux/topology.h  | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>  kernel/kthread.c          |  2 +-
>  mm/page_alloc.c           |  1 +
>  mm/slub.c                 | 24 ++++++++++++++++++------
>  6 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-08-22  1:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-14  0:13 [RFC PATCH 0/4] Improve slab consumption with memoryless nodes Nishanth Aravamudan
2014-08-14  0:14 ` [RFC PATCH v3 1/4] topology: add support for node_to_mem_node() to determine the fallback node Nishanth Aravamudan
2014-08-14 14:35   ` Christoph Lameter
2014-08-14 20:06     ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2014-08-22 21:52       ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2014-08-14  0:15 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] slub: fallback to node_to_mem_node() node if allocating on memoryless node Nishanth Aravamudan
2014-08-14  0:16 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] Partial revert of 81c98869faa5 ("kthread: ensure locality of task_struct allocations") Nishanth Aravamudan
2014-08-14  0:17 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] powerpc: reorder per-cpu NUMA information's initialization Nishanth Aravamudan
2014-08-22  1:10 ` Nishanth Aravamudan [this message]
2014-08-22 20:32   ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] Improve slab consumption with memoryless nodes Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140822011011.GF13999@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=nacc@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anton@samba.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=hanpt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=mpm@selenic.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).