From: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Han Pingtian <hanpt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>, Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Wanpeng Li <liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Improve slab consumption with memoryless nodes
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 18:10:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140822011011.GF13999@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140814001301.GI11121@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On 13.08.2014 [17:13:01 -0700], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> Anton noticed (http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mm/msg67489.html) that
> on ppc LPARs with memoryless nodes, a large amount of memory was
> consumed by slabs and was marked unreclaimable. He tracked it down to
> slab deactivations in the SLUB core when we allocate remotely, leading
> to poor efficiency always when memoryless nodes are present.
>
> After much discussion, Joonsoo provided a few patches that help
> significantly. They don't resolve the problem altogether:
>
> - memory hotplug still needs testing, that is when a memoryless node
> becomes memory-ful, we want to dtrt
> - there are other reasons for going off-node than memoryless nodes,
> e.g., fully exhausted local nodes
>
> Neither case is resolved with this series, but I don't think that should
> block their acceptance, as they can be explored/resolved with follow-on
> patches.
>
> The series consists of:
>
> [1/4] topology: add support for node_to_mem_node() to determine the fallback node
> [2/4] slub: fallback to node_to_mem_node() node if allocating on memoryless node
>
> - Joonsoo's patches to cache the nearest node with memory for each
> NUMA node
>
> [3/4] Partial revert of 81c98869faa5 (""kthread: ensure locality of task_struct allocations")
>
> - At Tejun's request, keep the knowledge of memoryless node fallback to
> the allocator core.
>
> [4/4] powerpc: reorder per-cpu NUMA information's initialization
>
> - Fix what appears to be a bug with when the NUMA topology information
> is stored in the powerpc initialization code.
Andrew & others,
I know kernel summit is going on, so I'll be patient, but was just
curious if anyone had any further comments other than Christoph's on the
naming.
Thanks,
Nish
>
> arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c | 12 ++++++------
> arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c | 13 ++++++++++---
> include/linux/topology.h | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> kernel/kthread.c | 2 +-
> mm/page_alloc.c | 1 +
> mm/slub.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++------
> 6 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-22 1:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-14 0:13 [RFC PATCH 0/4] Improve slab consumption with memoryless nodes Nishanth Aravamudan
2014-08-14 0:14 ` [RFC PATCH v3 1/4] topology: add support for node_to_mem_node() to determine the fallback node Nishanth Aravamudan
2014-08-14 14:35 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-08-14 20:06 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2014-08-22 21:52 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2014-08-14 0:15 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] slub: fallback to node_to_mem_node() node if allocating on memoryless node Nishanth Aravamudan
2014-08-14 0:16 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] Partial revert of 81c98869faa5 ("kthread: ensure locality of task_struct allocations") Nishanth Aravamudan
2014-08-14 0:17 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] powerpc: reorder per-cpu NUMA information's initialization Nishanth Aravamudan
2014-08-22 1:10 ` Nishanth Aravamudan [this message]
2014-08-22 20:32 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] Improve slab consumption with memoryless nodes Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140822011011.GF13999@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=nacc@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=hanpt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).