From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qa0-f42.google.com (mail-qa0-f42.google.com [209.85.216.42]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5C25900021 for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 09:31:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-qa0-f42.google.com with SMTP id cs9so442077qab.29 for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 06:31:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.mandriva.com.br (mail.mandriva.com.br. [177.220.134.171]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m7si2299088qac.52.2014.10.28.06.31.39 for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 06:31:40 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 11:31:31 -0200 From: Marco A Benatto Subject: Re: UKSM: What's maintainers think about it? Message-ID: <20141028133131.GA1445@sirus.conectiva> References: <20141025213201.005762f9.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141025213201.005762f9.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Andrew Morton Cc: Timofey Titovets , Linux Kernel , linux-mm@kvack.org Hi All, I'm not mantainer at all, but I've being using UKSM for a long time and remember to port it to 3.16 family once. UKSM seems good and stable and, at least for me, doesn't raised any errors. AFAIK the only limitation I know (maybe I has been fixed already) it isn't able to work together with zram stuff due to some race-conditions. Cheers, Marco A Benatto Mandriva OEM Developer On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 09:32:01PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Sat, 25 Oct 2014 22:25:56 +0300 Timofey Titovets wrote: > > > Good time of day, people. > > I try to find 'mm' subsystem specific people and lists, but list > > linux-mm looks dead and mail archive look like deprecated. > > If i must to sent this message to another list or add CC people, let me know. > > linux-mm@kvack.org is alive and well. > > > If questions are already asked (i can't find activity before), feel > > free to kick me. > > > > The main questions: > > 1. Somebody test it? I see many reviews about it. > > I already port it to latest linux-next-git kernel and its work without issues. > > http://pastebin.com/6FMuKagS > > (if it matter, i can describe use cases and results, if somebody ask it) > > > > 2. Developers of UKSM already tried to merge it? Somebody talked with uksm devs? > > offtop: now i try to communicate with dev's on kerneldedup.org forum, > > but i have problems with email verification and wait admin > > registration approval. > > (i already sent questions to > > http://kerneldedup.org/forum/home.php?mod=space&username=xianai , > > because him looks like team leader) > > > > 3. I just want collect feedbacks from linux maintainers team, if you > > decide what UKSM not needed in kernel, all other comments (as i > > understand) not matter. > > > > Like KSM, but better. > > UKSM - Ultra Kernel Samepage Merging > > http://kerneldedup.org/en/projects/uksm/introduction/ > > It's the first I've heard of it. No, as far as I know there has been > no attempt to upstream UKSM. > > -- > To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in > the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, > see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . > Don't email: email@kvack.org -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org