From: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC ATTEND]
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2015 11:58:28 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150107085828.GA2110@esperanza> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150106161435.GF20860@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 05:14:35PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
> And as a memcg co-maintainer I would like to also discuss the following
> topics.
> - We should finally settle down with a set of core knobs exported with
> the new unified hierarchy cgroups API. I have proposed this already
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=140552160325228&w=2 but there is no
> clear consensus and the discussion has died later on. I feel it would
> be more productive to sit together and come up with a reasonable
> compromise between - let's start from the begining and keep useful and
> reasonable features.
>
> - kmem accounting is seeing a lot of activity mainly thanks to Vladimir.
> He is basically the only active developer in this area. I would be
> happy if he can attend as well and discuss his future plans in the
> area. The work overlaps with slab allocators and slab shrinkers so
> having people familiar with these areas would be more than welcome
One more memcg related topic that is worth discussing IMO:
- On global memory pressure we walk over all memory cgroups and scan
pages from each of them. Since there can be hundreds or even
thousands of memory cgroups, such a walk can be quite expensive,
especially if the cgroups are small so that to reclaim anything from
them we have to descend to a lower scan priority. The problem is
augmented by offline memory cgroups, which now can be dangling for
indefinitely long time.
That's why I think we should work out a better algorithm for the
memory reclaimer. May be, we could rank memory cgroups somehow (by
their age, memory consumption?) and try to scan only the top ranked
cgroup during a reclaimer run. This topic is also very close to the
soft limit reclaim improvements, which Michal has been working on for
a while.
Thanks,
Vladimir
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-07 8:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-06 16:14 [LSF/MM TOPIC ATTEND] Michal Hocko
2015-01-06 23:27 ` Greg Thelen
2015-01-07 14:28 ` Michal Hocko
2015-01-07 18:54 ` Greg Thelen
2015-01-07 19:00 ` Greg Thelen
2015-01-14 21:27 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2015-01-15 14:06 ` Michal Hocko
2015-01-15 20:58 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2015-01-07 8:58 ` Vladimir Davydov [this message]
2015-01-07 14:38 ` Michal Hocko
2015-01-08 8:33 ` Vladimir Davydov
2015-01-08 9:09 ` Michal Hocko
2015-02-02 8:37 ` [LSF/MM TOPIC ATTEND] - THP benefits Vlastimil Babka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150107085828.GA2110@esperanza \
--to=vdavydov@parallels.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).