From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pa0-f54.google.com (mail-pa0-f54.google.com [209.85.220.54]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F84B6B0032 for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2015 07:24:52 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-pa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id fb1so11457625pad.13 for ; Thu, 08 Jan 2015 04:24:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org. [2001:1868:205::9]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z9si8201882par.226.2015.01.08.04.24.50 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 08 Jan 2015 04:24:51 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2015 04:24:48 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] xfs: truncate vs page fault IO exclusion Message-ID: <20150108122448.GA18034@infradead.org> References: <1420669543-8093-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1420669543-8093-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org > This patchset passes xfstests and various benchmarks and stress > workloads, so the real question is now: > > What have I missed? > > Comments, thoughts, flames? Why is this done in XFS and not in generic code? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org