From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: aarcange@redhat.com, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/page_alloc.c: drop dead destroy_compound_page()
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2015 16:24:19 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150109162419.b52796aee45d6747399d2ebb@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150108141004.AB3461A2@black.fi.intel.com>
On Thu, 8 Jan 2015 16:10:04 +0200 (EET) "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> Something like this?
>
> >From 5fd481c1c521112e9cea407f5a2644c9f93d0e14 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2015 15:59:23 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] mm: more checks on free_pages_prepare() for tail pages
>
> Apart form being dead, destroy_compound_page() did some potentially
> useful checks. Let's re-introduce them in free_pages_prepare(), where
> they can be acctually triggered.
>
> compound_order() assert is already in free_pages_prepare(). We have few
> checks for tail pages left.
>
I'm thinking we avoid the overhead unless CONFIG_DEBUG_VM?
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: mm-more-checks-on-free_pages_prepare-for-tail-pages-fix
Make it conditional on CONFIG_DEBUG_VM, make free_tail_pages_check()
return void.
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
mm/page_alloc.c | 16 +++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff -puN mm/page_alloc.c~mm-more-checks-on-free_pages_prepare-for-tail-pages-fix mm/page_alloc.c
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c~mm-more-checks-on-free_pages_prepare-for-tail-pages-fix
+++ a/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -764,20 +764,26 @@ static void free_one_page(struct zone *z
spin_unlock(&zone->lock);
}
-static int free_tail_pages_check(struct page *head_page, struct page *page)
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_VM
+static void free_tail_pages_check(struct page *head_page, struct page *page)
{
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_VM))
- return 0;
+ return;
if (unlikely(!PageTail(page))) {
bad_page(page, "PageTail not set", 0);
- return 1;
+ return;
}
if (unlikely(page->first_page != head_page)) {
bad_page(page, "first_page not consistent", 0);
- return 1;
+ return;
}
- return 0;
}
+#else
+static inline void free_tail_pages_check(struct page *head_page,
+ struct page *page)
+{
+}
+#endif
static bool free_pages_prepare(struct page *page, unsigned int order)
{
_
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-10 0:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-05 11:46 [PATCH] mm/page_alloc.c: drop dead destroy_compound_page() Kirill A. Shutemov
2015-01-06 17:43 ` Vlastimil Babka
2015-01-06 18:29 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2015-01-07 21:40 ` Andrew Morton
2015-01-08 14:10 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2015-01-10 0:24 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2015-01-10 0:41 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2015-01-10 1:06 ` Andrew Morton
2015-01-10 1:15 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150109162419.b52796aee45d6747399d2ebb@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).