From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>, Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Use GFP_KERNEL allocation for the page cache in page_cache_read
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 18:14:39 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150319071439.GE28621@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150318145528.GK17241@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 03:55:28PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 18-03-15 10:44:11, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > On 03/18/2015 10:09 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > page_cache_read has been historically using page_cache_alloc_cold to
> > > allocate a new page. This means that mapping_gfp_mask is used as the
> > > base for the gfp_mask. Many filesystems are setting this mask to
> > > GFP_NOFS to prevent from fs recursion issues. page_cache_read is,
> > > however, not called from the fs layer
> >
> > Is that true for filesystems that have directories in
> > the page cache?
>
> I haven't found any explicit callers of filemap_fault except for ocfs2
> and ceph and those seem OK to me. Which filesystems you have in mind?
Just about every major filesystem calls filemap_fault through the
.fault callout.
C symbol: filemap_fault
File Function Line
0 9p/vfs_file.c <global> 831 .fault = filemap_fault,
1 9p/vfs_file.c <global> 838 .fault = filemap_fault,
2 btrfs/file.c <global> 2081 .fault = filemap_fault,
3 cifs/file.c <global> 3242 .fault = filemap_fault,
4 ext4/file.c <global> 215 .fault = filemap_fault,
5 f2fs/file.c <global> 93 .fault = filemap_fault,
6 fuse/file.c <global> 2062 .fault = filemap_fault,
7 gfs2/file.c <global> 498 .fault = filemap_fault,
8 nfs/file.c <global> 653 .fault = filemap_fault,
9 nilfs2/file.c <global> 128 .fault = filemap_fault,
a ubifs/file.c <global> 1536 .fault = filemap_fault,
b xfs/xfs_file.c <global> 1420 .fault = filemap_fault,
> Btw. how would that work as we already have GFP_KERNEL allocation few
> lines below?
GFP_KERNEL allocation for mappings is simply wrong. All mapping
allocations where the caller cannot pass a gfp_mask need to obey
the mapping_gfp_mask that is set by the mapping owner....
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-19 7:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-18 14:09 [PATCH] mm: Use GFP_KERNEL allocation for the page cache in page_cache_read Michal Hocko
2015-03-18 14:32 ` Rik van Riel
2015-03-18 14:37 ` Michal Hocko
2015-03-18 14:38 ` Mel Gorman
2015-03-18 14:43 ` Michal Hocko
2015-03-18 14:44 ` Rik van Riel
2015-03-18 14:55 ` Michal Hocko
2015-03-19 7:14 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2015-03-19 11:11 ` [PATCH] mm: Use GFP_KERNEL allocation for the page cache inpage_cache_read Tetsuo Handa
2015-03-19 12:44 ` [PATCH] mm: Use GFP_KERNEL allocation for the page cache in page_cache_read Michal Hocko
2015-03-20 3:48 ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-20 13:14 ` Michal Hocko
2015-03-20 22:51 ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-23 13:02 ` Michal Hocko
2015-03-26 9:53 ` Michal Hocko
2015-03-26 21:43 ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-30 8:22 ` Michal Hocko
2015-03-31 21:46 ` Dave Chinner
2015-04-07 12:16 ` Michal Hocko
2015-03-18 15:45 ` Michal Hocko
2015-03-18 21:38 ` NeilBrown
2015-03-19 13:55 ` Michal Hocko
2015-03-19 14:27 ` Michal Hocko
2015-03-20 3:57 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150319071439.GE28621@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mfasheh@suse.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=sage@inktank.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).