From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>,
Yalin.Wang@sonymobile.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] mm: move lazy free pages to inactive list
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 14:57:29 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150331055729.GC16825@blaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150330222847.f255962c.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 10:28:47PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Mar 2015 13:45:25 +0900 Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > deactivate_page() doesn't look at or alter PageReferenced(). Should it?
> >
> > Absolutely true. Thanks.
> > Here it goes.
> >
> > >From 2b2c92eb73a1cceac615b9abd4c0f5f0c3395ff5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
> > Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 13:38:46 +0900
> > Subject: [PATCH] mm: lru_deactivate_fn should clear PG_referenced
> >
> > deactivate_page aims for accelerate for reclaiming through
> > moving pages from active list to inactive list so we should
> > clear PG_referenced for the goal.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > --- a/mm/swap.c
> > +++ b/mm/swap.c
> > @@ -800,6 +800,7 @@ static void lru_deactivate_fn(struct page *page, struct lruvec *lruvec,
> >
> > del_page_from_lru_list(page, lruvec, lru + LRU_ACTIVE);
> > ClearPageActive(page);
> > + ClearPageReferenced(page);
> > add_page_to_lru_list(page, lruvec, lru);
> >
> > __count_vm_event(PGDEACTIVATE);
>
> What if we have
>
> PageLRU(page) && !PageActive(page) && PageReferenced(page)
>
> if we really want to "accelerate the reclaim of @page" then we should
> clear PG_referenced there too.
The function's name is *deactivate*_page. IOW, I think it should work
for only pages in active list, IMHO.
>
> (And what about page_referenced(page) :))
Yes, I considered it when you mentioned PG_referenced. Now, madvise_free
clear out access bit of page table when the syscall is called so
shrink_page_list could reclaim pages easily.
Of course, we could clear access bit by page_referenced for general purpose,
not only madvise_free but it would hurt performance for madvise_free so
I'd like to leave it unless there is a need for the function.
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-31 5:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-11 1:20 [PATCH 1/4] mm: free swp_entry in madvise_free Minchan Kim
2015-03-11 1:20 ` [PATCH 2/4] mm: change deactivate_page with deactivate_file_page Minchan Kim
2015-03-11 1:20 ` [PATCH 3/4] mm: move lazy free pages to inactive list Minchan Kim
2015-03-11 2:14 ` Wang, Yalin
2015-03-11 4:30 ` Minchan Kim
2015-04-01 20:38 ` Rik van Riel
2015-03-11 9:05 ` [RFC ] mm: don't ignore file map pages for madvise_free( ) Wang, Yalin
2015-03-11 9:47 ` [RFC] mm:do recheck for freeable page in reclaim path Wang, Yalin
2015-03-20 22:43 ` [PATCH 3/4] mm: move lazy free pages to inactive list Andrew Morton
2015-03-30 5:35 ` Minchan Kim
2015-03-30 21:20 ` Andrew Morton
2015-03-31 4:45 ` Minchan Kim
2015-03-31 5:28 ` Andrew Morton
2015-03-31 5:57 ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2015-03-11 1:20 ` [PATCH 4/4] mm: make every pte dirty on do_swap_page Minchan Kim
2015-03-30 5:22 ` Minchan Kim
2015-03-30 8:51 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2015-03-30 8:59 ` Minchan Kim
2015-03-30 21:14 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2015-03-31 4:38 ` Minchan Kim
2015-04-08 23:50 ` Minchan Kim
2015-04-09 20:59 ` Andrew Morton
2015-04-10 0:08 ` Minchan Kim
2015-04-10 0:14 ` Rik van Riel
2015-04-11 21:40 ` Hugh Dickins
2015-04-12 14:48 ` Minchan Kim
2015-04-15 6:49 ` Minchan Kim
2015-03-19 0:46 ` [PATCH 1/4] mm: free swp_entry in madvise_free Minchan Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150331055729.GC16825@blaptop \
--to=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=Yalin.Wang@sonymobile.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=shli@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).