From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Steve Capper <steve.capper@linaro.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: get page_cache_get_speculative() work on tail pages
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 15:09:05 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150402120905.GD24028@node.dhcp.inet.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.11.1504011705310.6939@eggly.anvils>
On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 05:08:53PM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Apr 2015, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 04:21:30PM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2 Apr 2015, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > >
> > > > Generic RCU fast GUP rely on page_cache_get_speculative() to obtain pin
> > > > on pte-mapped page. As pointed by Aneesh during review of my compound
> > > > pages refcounting rework, page_cache_get_speculative() would fail on
> > > > pte-mapped tail page, since tail pages always have page->_count == 0.
> > > >
> > > > That means we would never be able to successfully obtain pin on
> > > > pte-mapped tail page via generic RCU fast GUP.
> > > >
> > > > But the problem is not exclusive to my patchset. In current kernel some
> > > > drivers (sound, for instance) already map compound pages with PTEs.
> > >
> > > Hah, you were sending this as I was replying to the original thread.
> > >
> > > Do we care if fast gup fails on some hardware driver's compound pages?
> > > I don't think we do, and it would be better not to complicate the
> > > low-level page_cache_get_speculative for them.
> >
> > Fair enough :-/
> >
> > I'll check tomorrow if it will look more reasonable on gup_pte_range()
> > level, rather than page_cache_get_speculative().
>
> But we don't need it on the (fast) gup_pte_range() level either, do we?
> Or do you have THP changes in mmotm which are now demanding this?
No. I'll keep it local to my patchset.
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-02 12:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-01 22:52 [PATCH] mm: get page_cache_get_speculative() work on tail pages Kirill A. Shutemov
2015-04-01 23:21 ` Hugh Dickins
2015-04-01 23:56 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2015-04-02 0:08 ` Hugh Dickins
2015-04-02 12:09 ` Kirill A. Shutemov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150402120905.GD24028@node.dhcp.inet.fi \
--to=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=steve.capper@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).