From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
To: Marcin Jabrzyk <m.jabrzyk@samsung.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>,
minchan@kernel.org, ngupta@vflare.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
kyungmin.park@samsung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] zram: check compressor name before setting it
Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 15:18:38 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150525061838.GB555@swordfish> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <555F2E7C.4090707@samsung.com>
On (05/22/15 15:26), Marcin Jabrzyk wrote:
> >> From the other hand, the only valid values that can be written are
> >>in 'comp_algorithm'.
> >>So when writing other one, returning -EINVAL seems to be reasonable.
> >>The user would get immediately information that he can't do that,
> >>now the information can be very deferred in time.
> >
> >it's not.
> >the error message appears in syslog right before we return -EINVAL
> >back to user.
>
> Yes I've read up the code more detailed and I saw that error message
> just before returning to user with error value.
>
> But this happens when 'disksize' is wirtten, not when 'comp_algorithm'.
> I understood, the error message in dmesg is clear there is no such
> algorithm.
>
> But this is not an immediate error, when setting the 'comp_algorithm',
> where we already know that it's wrong, not existing etc.
> Anything after that moment would be wrong and would not work at all.
>
> From what I saw 'comp_algorithm_store' is the only *_store in zram that
> believes user that he writes proper value and just makes strlcpy.
>
> So what I've ing mind is to provide direct feedback, you have
> written wrong name of compressor, you got -EINVAL, please write
> correct value. This would be very useful when scripting.
>
I can't see how printing error 0.0012 seconds earlier helps. really.
if one sets a compression algorithm the very next thing to do is to
set device's disksize. even if he/she usually watch a baseball game in
between, then the error message appears right when it's needed anyway:
during `setup my device and make it usable' stage.
>I'm not for exposing more internals, but getting -EINVAL would be nice I
you are.
find_backend() returns back to its caller a raw and completely initialized
zcomp_backend pointer. this is very dangerous zcomp internals, which should
never be exposed. from zcomp layer we return either ERR_PTR() or a usable
zcomp_backend pointer. that's the rule.
if you guys still insist that this is critical and very important change,
then there should be a small helper function instead with a clear name
(starting with zcomp_ to indicate its place) which will simply return bool
TRUE for `algorithm is known' case and FALSE otherwise (aka `algorithm is
unknown').
something like below:
# echo LZ5 > /sys/block/zram0/comp_algorithm
-bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument
dmesg
[ 7440.544852] Error: unknown compression algorithm: LZ5
p.s. but, I still see a very little value.
p.p.s notice a necessary and inevitable `dmesg'. (back to 'no one reads
syslog' argument).
---
drivers/block/zram/zcomp.c | 10 ++++++++++
drivers/block/zram/zcomp.h | 1 +
drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c | 3 +++
3 files changed, 14 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zcomp.c b/drivers/block/zram/zcomp.c
index a1a8b8e..b68b16f 100644
--- a/drivers/block/zram/zcomp.c
+++ b/drivers/block/zram/zcomp.c
@@ -54,11 +54,16 @@ static struct zcomp_backend *backends[] = {
static struct zcomp_backend *find_backend(const char *compress)
{
int i = 0;
+
while (backends[i]) {
if (sysfs_streq(compress, backends[i]->name))
break;
i++;
}
+
+ if (!backends[i])
+ pr_err("Error: unknown compression algorithm: %s\n",
+ compress);
return backends[i];
}
@@ -320,6 +325,11 @@ void zcomp_destroy(struct zcomp *comp)
kfree(comp);
}
+bool zcomp_known_algorithm(const char *comp)
+{
+ return find_backend(comp) != NULL;
+}
+
/*
* search available compressors for requested algorithm.
* allocate new zcomp and initialize it. return compressing
diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zcomp.h b/drivers/block/zram/zcomp.h
index c59d1fc..773bdf1 100644
--- a/drivers/block/zram/zcomp.h
+++ b/drivers/block/zram/zcomp.h
@@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ struct zcomp {
};
ssize_t zcomp_available_show(const char *comp, char *buf);
+bool zcomp_known_algorithm(const char *comp);
struct zcomp *zcomp_create(const char *comp, int max_strm);
void zcomp_destroy(struct zcomp *comp);
diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
index f750e34..2197a81 100644
--- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
@@ -378,6 +378,9 @@ static ssize_t comp_algorithm_store(struct device *dev,
if (sz > 0 && zram->compressor[sz - 1] == '\n')
zram->compressor[sz - 1] = 0x00;
+ if (!zcomp_known_algorithm(zram->compressor))
+ len = -EINVAL;
+
up_write(&zram->init_lock);
return len;
}
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-25 6:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-22 8:31 [PATCH] zram: check compressor name before setting it Marcin Jabrzyk
2015-05-22 8:56 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-05-22 9:12 ` Marcin Jabrzyk
2015-05-22 12:44 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-05-22 13:14 ` Minchan Kim
2015-05-22 13:34 ` Marcin Jabrzyk
2015-05-25 4:03 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-05-25 14:16 ` Minchan Kim
2015-05-22 13:26 ` Marcin Jabrzyk
2015-05-25 6:18 ` Sergey Senozhatsky [this message]
2015-05-25 6:23 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-05-25 7:15 ` Marcin Jabrzyk
2015-05-25 7:34 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-05-25 8:05 ` Marcin Jabrzyk
2015-05-25 14:21 ` Minchan Kim
2015-05-26 0:09 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150525061838.GB555@swordfish \
--to=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=m.jabrzyk@samsung.com \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=ngupta@vflare.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).