From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pa0-f43.google.com (mail-pa0-f43.google.com [209.85.220.43]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 415F26B0032 for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 19:58:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: by payr10 with SMTP id r10so43263535pay.1 for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 16:58:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-pd0-x243.google.com (mail-pd0-x243.google.com. [2607:f8b0:400e:c02::243]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t3si16303174pdj.75.2015.06.10.16.58.11 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 10 Jun 2015 16:58:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by pdbht2 with SMTP id ht2so11414349pdb.2 for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 16:58:11 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 08:58:36 +0900 From: Sergey Senozhatsky Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/5] mm/zpool: allow NULL `zpool' pointer in zpool_destroy_pool() Message-ID: <20150610235836.GB499@swordfish> References: <1433851493-23685-1-git-send-email-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> <1433851493-23685-5-git-send-email-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Dan Streetman Cc: Joe Perches , Sergey Senozhatsky , Andrew Morton , Minchan Kim , Christoph Lameter , Pekka Enberg , Joonsoo Kim , Michal Hocko , David Rientjes , Linux-MM , linux-kernel , Sergey Senozhatsky On (06/10/15 16:59), Dan Streetman wrote: > On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 8:04 AM, Sergey Senozhatsky > wrote: > > zpool_destroy_pool() does not tolerate a NULL zpool pointer > > argument and performs a NULL-pointer dereference. Although > > there is only one zpool_destroy_pool() user (as of 4.1), > > still update it to be coherent with the corresponding > > destroy() functions of the remainig pool-allocators (slab, > > mempool, etc.), which now allow NULL pool-pointers. > > > > For consistency, tweak zpool_destroy_pool() and NULL-check the > > pointer there. > > > > Proposed by Andrew Morton. > > > > Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky > > Reported-by: Andrew Morton > > LKML-reference: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/6/8/583 > > Acked-by: Dan Streetman Thanks. Shall we ask Joe to add zpool_destroy_pool() to the "$func(NULL) is safe and this check is probably not required" list? -ss > > --- > > mm/zpool.c | 3 +++ > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/mm/zpool.c b/mm/zpool.c > > index bacdab6..2f59b90 100644 > > --- a/mm/zpool.c > > +++ b/mm/zpool.c > > @@ -202,6 +202,9 @@ struct zpool *zpool_create_pool(char *type, char *name, gfp_t gfp, > > */ > > void zpool_destroy_pool(struct zpool *zpool) > > { > > + if (unlikely(!zpool)) > > + return; > > + > > pr_info("destroying pool type %s\n", zpool->type); > > > > spin_lock(&pools_lock); > > -- > > 2.4.3.368.g7974889 > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in > > the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, > > see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . > > Don't email: email@kvack.org > -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org