* [BUG] fs: inotify_handle_event() reading un-init memory
@ 2015-06-16 11:33 Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-06-16 13:52 ` Jan Kara
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer @ 2015-06-16 11:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Kara; +Cc: linux-mm, linux-kernel, Jesper Dangaard Brouer
Caught by kmemcheck.
Don't know the fix... just pointed at the bug.
Introduced in commit 7053aee26a3 ("fsnotify: do not share
events between notification groups").
---
fs/notify/inotify/inotify_fsnotify.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/notify/inotify/inotify_fsnotify.c b/fs/notify/inotify/inotify_fsnotify.c
index 2cd900c2c737..370d66dc4ddb 100644
--- a/fs/notify/inotify/inotify_fsnotify.c
+++ b/fs/notify/inotify/inotify_fsnotify.c
@@ -96,11 +96,12 @@ int inotify_handle_event(struct fsnotify_group *group,
i_mark = container_of(inode_mark, struct inotify_inode_mark,
fsn_mark);
+ // new object alloc here
event = kmalloc(alloc_len, GFP_KERNEL);
if (unlikely(!event))
return -ENOMEM;
- fsn_event = &event->fse;
+ fsn_event = &event->fse; // This looks wrong!?! read from un-init mem?
fsnotify_init_event(fsn_event, inode, mask);
event->wd = i_mark->wd;
event->sync_cookie = cookie;
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [BUG] fs: inotify_handle_event() reading un-init memory
2015-06-16 11:33 [BUG] fs: inotify_handle_event() reading un-init memory Jesper Dangaard Brouer
@ 2015-06-16 13:52 ` Jan Kara
2015-06-16 20:22 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kara @ 2015-06-16 13:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer; +Cc: Jan Kara, linux-mm, linux-kernel
On Tue 16-06-15 13:33:18, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> Caught by kmemcheck.
>
> Don't know the fix... just pointed at the bug.
>
> Introduced in commit 7053aee26a3 ("fsnotify: do not share
> events between notification groups").
> ---
> fs/notify/inotify/inotify_fsnotify.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/notify/inotify/inotify_fsnotify.c b/fs/notify/inotify/inotify_fsnotify.c
> index 2cd900c2c737..370d66dc4ddb 100644
> --- a/fs/notify/inotify/inotify_fsnotify.c
> +++ b/fs/notify/inotify/inotify_fsnotify.c
> @@ -96,11 +96,12 @@ int inotify_handle_event(struct fsnotify_group *group,
> i_mark = container_of(inode_mark, struct inotify_inode_mark,
> fsn_mark);
>
> + // new object alloc here
> event = kmalloc(alloc_len, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (unlikely(!event))
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - fsn_event = &event->fse;
> + fsn_event = &event->fse; // This looks wrong!?! read from un-init mem?
Where is here any read? This is just a pointer arithmetics where we add
offset of 'fse' entry to 'event' address.
Honza
> fsnotify_init_event(fsn_event, inode, mask);
> event->wd = i_mark->wd;
> event->sync_cookie = cookie;
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [BUG] fs: inotify_handle_event() reading un-init memory
2015-06-16 13:52 ` Jan Kara
@ 2015-06-16 20:22 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-06-17 8:13 ` Jan Kara
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer @ 2015-06-16 20:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Kara; +Cc: linux-mm, linux-kernel, brouer
On Tue, 16 Jun 2015 15:52:09 +0200 Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> wrote:
> On Tue 16-06-15 13:33:18, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> > Caught by kmemcheck.
> >
> > Don't know the fix... just pointed at the bug.
> >
> > Introduced in commit 7053aee26a3 ("fsnotify: do not share
> > events between notification groups").
> > ---
> > fs/notify/inotify/inotify_fsnotify.c | 3 ++-
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/notify/inotify/inotify_fsnotify.c b/fs/notify/inotify/inotify_fsnotify.c
> > index 2cd900c2c737..370d66dc4ddb 100644
> > --- a/fs/notify/inotify/inotify_fsnotify.c
> > +++ b/fs/notify/inotify/inotify_fsnotify.c
> > @@ -96,11 +96,12 @@ int inotify_handle_event(struct fsnotify_group *group,
> > i_mark = container_of(inode_mark, struct inotify_inode_mark,
> > fsn_mark);
> >
> > + // new object alloc here
> > event = kmalloc(alloc_len, GFP_KERNEL);
> > if (unlikely(!event))
> > return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > - fsn_event = &event->fse;
> > + fsn_event = &event->fse; // This looks wrong!?! read from un-init mem?
>
> Where is here any read? This is just a pointer arithmetics where we add
> offset of 'fse' entry to 'event' address.
I was kmemcheck that complained, perhaps it is a false-positive?
--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Sr. Network Kernel Developer at Red Hat
Author of http://www.iptv-analyzer.org
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [BUG] fs: inotify_handle_event() reading un-init memory
2015-06-16 20:22 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
@ 2015-06-17 8:13 ` Jan Kara
2015-06-17 9:57 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kara @ 2015-06-17 8:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer; +Cc: Jan Kara, linux-mm, linux-kernel
On Tue 16-06-15 22:22:34, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
>
> On Tue, 16 Jun 2015 15:52:09 +0200 Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> wrote:
>
> > On Tue 16-06-15 13:33:18, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> > > Caught by kmemcheck.
> > >
> > > Don't know the fix... just pointed at the bug.
> > >
> > > Introduced in commit 7053aee26a3 ("fsnotify: do not share
> > > events between notification groups").
> > > ---
> > > fs/notify/inotify/inotify_fsnotify.c | 3 ++-
> > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/fs/notify/inotify/inotify_fsnotify.c b/fs/notify/inotify/inotify_fsnotify.c
> > > index 2cd900c2c737..370d66dc4ddb 100644
> > > --- a/fs/notify/inotify/inotify_fsnotify.c
> > > +++ b/fs/notify/inotify/inotify_fsnotify.c
> > > @@ -96,11 +96,12 @@ int inotify_handle_event(struct fsnotify_group *group,
> > > i_mark = container_of(inode_mark, struct inotify_inode_mark,
> > > fsn_mark);
> > >
> > > + // new object alloc here
> > > event = kmalloc(alloc_len, GFP_KERNEL);
> > > if (unlikely(!event))
> > > return -ENOMEM;
> > >
> > > - fsn_event = &event->fse;
> > > + fsn_event = &event->fse; // This looks wrong!?! read from un-init mem?
> >
> > Where is here any read? This is just a pointer arithmetics where we add
> > offset of 'fse' entry to 'event' address.
>
> I was kmemcheck that complained, perhaps it is a false-positive?
May be. What was the kmemcheck warning you saw? And can you also attach
disassembly of inotify_handle_event() from your kernel? Thanks!
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [BUG] fs: inotify_handle_event() reading un-init memory
2015-06-17 8:13 ` Jan Kara
@ 2015-06-17 9:57 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-06-17 10:17 ` Jan Kara
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer @ 2015-06-17 9:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Kara; +Cc: linux-mm, linux-kernel, brouer
On Wed, 17 Jun 2015 10:13:19 +0200
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> wrote:
> On Tue 16-06-15 22:22:34, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 16 Jun 2015 15:52:09 +0200 Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue 16-06-15 13:33:18, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> > > > Caught by kmemcheck.
> > > >
> > > > Don't know the fix... just pointed at the bug.
> > > >
> > > > Introduced in commit 7053aee26a3 ("fsnotify: do not share
> > > > events between notification groups").
> > > > ---
> > > > fs/notify/inotify/inotify_fsnotify.c | 3 ++-
> > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/fs/notify/inotify/inotify_fsnotify.c b/fs/notify/inotify/inotify_fsnotify.c
> > > > index 2cd900c2c737..370d66dc4ddb 100644
> > > > --- a/fs/notify/inotify/inotify_fsnotify.c
> > > > +++ b/fs/notify/inotify/inotify_fsnotify.c
> > > > @@ -96,11 +96,12 @@ int inotify_handle_event(struct fsnotify_group *group,
> > > > i_mark = container_of(inode_mark, struct inotify_inode_mark,
> > > > fsn_mark);
> > > >
> > > > + // new object alloc here
> > > > event = kmalloc(alloc_len, GFP_KERNEL);
> > > > if (unlikely(!event))
> > > > return -ENOMEM;
> > > >
> > > > - fsn_event = &event->fse;
> > > > + fsn_event = &event->fse; // This looks wrong!?! read from un-init mem?
> > >
> > > Where is here any read? This is just a pointer arithmetics where we add
> > > offset of 'fse' entry to 'event' address.
> >
> > I was kmemcheck that complained, perhaps it is a false-positive?
>
> May be. What was the kmemcheck warning you saw?
Kernel logmsg:
kernel: WARNING: kmemcheck: Caught 64-bit read from freed memory (ffff8800c8de7bc0)
kernel: 807bdec80088ffffc07bdec80088ffff588a508b0388ffff020000080000adde
kernel: f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f
kernel: ^
kernel: RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8116148a>] [<ffffffff8116148a>] __kmalloc+0x7a/0x1c0
kernel: RSP: 0018:ffff88038b47fc88 EFLAGS: 00010286
kernel: RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff88038b5df138 RCX: 0000000000012e2b
kernel: RDX: 0000000000012e2a RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffffffff811aef8a
kernel: RBP: ffff88038b47fcb8 R08: 00000000000217f0 R09: ffff88038b508cd8
kernel: R10: 0000000000000000 R11: ffff88038b6ede00 R12: ffff88038f803b00
kernel: R13: ffff8800c8de7bc0 R14: 000000000000003f R15: 00000000000000d0
kernel: FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88038fd40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
kernel: CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
kernel: CR2: ffff8800c8feaab0 CR3: 000000038c424000 CR4: 00000000001407e0
kernel: DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
kernel: DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff4ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
kernel: [<ffffffff811aef8a>] inotify_handle_event+0x6a/0x180
kernel: [<ffffffff811acd0d>] fsnotify+0x2cd/0x480
kernel: [<ffffffff811ad0dd>] __fsnotify_parent+0xdd/0xf0
kernel: [<ffffffff8118f49f>] notify_change+0x26f/0x3a0
kernel: [<ffffffff81172378>] do_truncate+0x68/0xa0
kernel: [<ffffffff811726dc>] do_sys_ftruncate.constprop.16+0xfc/0x150
kernel: [<ffffffff81172759>] SyS_ftruncate+0x9/0x10
kernel: [<ffffffff81658117>] system_call_fastpath+0x12/0x6a
kernel: [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
> And can you also attach disassembly of inotify_handle_event() from
> your kernel?
No, it was many kernel compile since...
I tried to reproduce on my current kernel, and now I don't hit it. But
I hit this instead (which is NOT related to your code):
kernel: WARNING: kmemcheck: Caught 64-bit read from uninitialized memory (ffff8800371df628)
kernel: 189626090488ffff60351f370088ffffb50300000000000038f61d370088ffff
kernel: u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u
kernel: ^
kernel: RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8110d9a6>] [<ffffffff8110d9a6>] vma_interval_tree_remove+0x1c6/0x240
kernel: RSP: 0018:ffff880408a2fd30 EFLAGS: 00010286
kernel: RAX: ffff8800371df618 RBX: ffff8804092fb700 RCX: 0000000000000000
kernel: RDX: ffff8800371df619 RSI: ffff88040d05b6b8 RDI: ffff8800371f3508
kernel: RBP: ffff880408a2fd38 R08: 00007f556712a000 R09: ffff880000000000
kernel: R10: ffff8800371f3560 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff8800371f3508
kernel: R13: ffff88040d05b6c0 R14: ffff88040d05b698 R15: ffff8800371f3508
kernel: FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88041dc40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
kernel: CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
kernel: CR2: ffff8800c6865540 CR3: 00000000018bb000 CR4: 00000000001407e0
kernel: DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
kernel: DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff4ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
kernel: [<ffffffff8111738b>] unlink_file_vma+0x3b/0x50
kernel: [<ffffffff81110e20>] free_pgtables+0xb0/0x120
kernel: [<ffffffff8111a1d7>] exit_mmap+0xd7/0x150
kernel: [<ffffffff81053cd0>] mmput+0x50/0xe0
kernel: [<ffffffff811182de>] SyS_mmap_pgoff+0x10e/0x210
kernel: [<ffffffff8100796d>] SyS_mmap+0x1d/0x20
kernel: [<ffffffff815fabd7>] system_call_fastpath+0x12/0x6a
kernel: [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
$ addr2line -e vmlinux -i ffffffff8110d9a6
/home/jbrouer/git/kernel/net-next-mm/include/linux/rbtree_augmented.h:125
/home/jbrouer/git/kernel/net-next-mm/include/linux/rbtree_augmented.h:154
/home/jbrouer/git/kernel/net-next-mm/include/linux/rbtree_augmented.h:237
/home/jbrouer/git/kernel/net-next-mm/mm/interval_tree.c:24
$ gdb vmlinux
(gdb) list *(vma_interval_tree_remove)+0x1c6
0xffffffff8110d9a6 is in vma_interval_tree_remove (include/linux/rbtree_augmented.h:125).
120 static inline void
121 __rb_change_child(struct rb_node *old, struct rb_node *new,
122 struct rb_node *parent, struct rb_root *root)
123 {
124 if (parent) {
125 if (parent->rb_left == old)
126 parent->rb_left = new;
127 else
128 parent->rb_right = new;
129 } else
This is a kernel based on DaveM's net-next at commit 89d256bb69f259
("bpf: disallow bpf tc programs access current->pid,uid").
Thus, I might be missing some fix commits from other trees?!?
--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Sr. Network Kernel Developer at Red Hat
Author of http://www.iptv-analyzer.org
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [BUG] fs: inotify_handle_event() reading un-init memory
2015-06-17 9:57 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
@ 2015-06-17 10:17 ` Jan Kara
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kara @ 2015-06-17 10:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer; +Cc: Jan Kara, linux-mm, linux-kernel
On Wed 17-06-15 11:57:07, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Jun 2015 10:13:19 +0200
> Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> wrote:
>
> > On Tue 16-06-15 22:22:34, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 16 Jun 2015 15:52:09 +0200 Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tue 16-06-15 13:33:18, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> > > > > Caught by kmemcheck.
> > > > >
> > > > > Don't know the fix... just pointed at the bug.
> > > > >
> > > > > Introduced in commit 7053aee26a3 ("fsnotify: do not share
> > > > > events between notification groups").
> > > > > ---
> > > > > fs/notify/inotify/inotify_fsnotify.c | 3 ++-
> > > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/fs/notify/inotify/inotify_fsnotify.c b/fs/notify/inotify/inotify_fsnotify.c
> > > > > index 2cd900c2c737..370d66dc4ddb 100644
> > > > > --- a/fs/notify/inotify/inotify_fsnotify.c
> > > > > +++ b/fs/notify/inotify/inotify_fsnotify.c
> > > > > @@ -96,11 +96,12 @@ int inotify_handle_event(struct fsnotify_group *group,
> > > > > i_mark = container_of(inode_mark, struct inotify_inode_mark,
> > > > > fsn_mark);
> > > > >
> > > > > + // new object alloc here
> > > > > event = kmalloc(alloc_len, GFP_KERNEL);
> > > > > if (unlikely(!event))
> > > > > return -ENOMEM;
> > > > >
> > > > > - fsn_event = &event->fse;
> > > > > + fsn_event = &event->fse; // This looks wrong!?! read from un-init mem?
> > > >
> > > > Where is here any read? This is just a pointer arithmetics where we add
> > > > offset of 'fse' entry to 'event' address.
> > >
> > > I was kmemcheck that complained, perhaps it is a false-positive?
> >
> > May be. What was the kmemcheck warning you saw?
>
> Kernel logmsg:
> kernel: WARNING: kmemcheck: Caught 64-bit read from freed memory (ffff8800c8de7bc0)
> kernel: 807bdec80088ffffc07bdec80088ffff588a508b0388ffff020000080000adde
> kernel: f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f
> kernel: ^
> kernel: RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8116148a>] [<ffffffff8116148a>] __kmalloc+0x7a/0x1c0
Hum, but this one rather seems as a problem / false positive in __kmalloc()
itself, not in the inotify code...
> kernel: RSP: 0018:ffff88038b47fc88 EFLAGS: 00010286
> kernel: RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff88038b5df138 RCX: 0000000000012e2b
> kernel: RDX: 0000000000012e2a RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffffffff811aef8a
> kernel: RBP: ffff88038b47fcb8 R08: 00000000000217f0 R09: ffff88038b508cd8
> kernel: R10: 0000000000000000 R11: ffff88038b6ede00 R12: ffff88038f803b00
> kernel: R13: ffff8800c8de7bc0 R14: 000000000000003f R15: 00000000000000d0
> kernel: FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88038fd40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> kernel: CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> kernel: CR2: ffff8800c8feaab0 CR3: 000000038c424000 CR4: 00000000001407e0
> kernel: DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> kernel: DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff4ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> kernel: [<ffffffff811aef8a>] inotify_handle_event+0x6a/0x180
> kernel: [<ffffffff811acd0d>] fsnotify+0x2cd/0x480
> kernel: [<ffffffff811ad0dd>] __fsnotify_parent+0xdd/0xf0
> kernel: [<ffffffff8118f49f>] notify_change+0x26f/0x3a0
> kernel: [<ffffffff81172378>] do_truncate+0x68/0xa0
> kernel: [<ffffffff811726dc>] do_sys_ftruncate.constprop.16+0xfc/0x150
> kernel: [<ffffffff81172759>] SyS_ftruncate+0x9/0x10
> kernel: [<ffffffff81658117>] system_call_fastpath+0x12/0x6a
> kernel: [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
>
> > And can you also attach disassembly of inotify_handle_event() from
> > your kernel?
>
> No, it was many kernel compile since...
>
> I tried to reproduce on my current kernel, and now I don't hit it. But
> I hit this instead (which is NOT related to your code):
>
> kernel: WARNING: kmemcheck: Caught 64-bit read from uninitialized memory (ffff8800371df628)
> kernel: 189626090488ffff60351f370088ffffb50300000000000038f61d370088ffff
> kernel: u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u
> kernel: ^
> kernel: RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8110d9a6>] [<ffffffff8110d9a6>] vma_interval_tree_remove+0x1c6/0x240
> kernel: RSP: 0018:ffff880408a2fd30 EFLAGS: 00010286
> kernel: RAX: ffff8800371df618 RBX: ffff8804092fb700 RCX: 0000000000000000
> kernel: RDX: ffff8800371df619 RSI: ffff88040d05b6b8 RDI: ffff8800371f3508
> kernel: RBP: ffff880408a2fd38 R08: 00007f556712a000 R09: ffff880000000000
> kernel: R10: ffff8800371f3560 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff8800371f3508
> kernel: R13: ffff88040d05b6c0 R14: ffff88040d05b698 R15: ffff8800371f3508
> kernel: FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88041dc40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> kernel: CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> kernel: CR2: ffff8800c6865540 CR3: 00000000018bb000 CR4: 00000000001407e0
> kernel: DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> kernel: DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff4ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> kernel: [<ffffffff8111738b>] unlink_file_vma+0x3b/0x50
> kernel: [<ffffffff81110e20>] free_pgtables+0xb0/0x120
> kernel: [<ffffffff8111a1d7>] exit_mmap+0xd7/0x150
> kernel: [<ffffffff81053cd0>] mmput+0x50/0xe0
> kernel: [<ffffffff811182de>] SyS_mmap_pgoff+0x10e/0x210
> kernel: [<ffffffff8100796d>] SyS_mmap+0x1d/0x20
> kernel: [<ffffffff815fabd7>] system_call_fastpath+0x12/0x6a
> kernel: [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
>
> $ addr2line -e vmlinux -i ffffffff8110d9a6
> /home/jbrouer/git/kernel/net-next-mm/include/linux/rbtree_augmented.h:125
> /home/jbrouer/git/kernel/net-next-mm/include/linux/rbtree_augmented.h:154
> /home/jbrouer/git/kernel/net-next-mm/include/linux/rbtree_augmented.h:237
> /home/jbrouer/git/kernel/net-next-mm/mm/interval_tree.c:24
>
> $ gdb vmlinux
> (gdb) list *(vma_interval_tree_remove)+0x1c6
> 0xffffffff8110d9a6 is in vma_interval_tree_remove (include/linux/rbtree_augmented.h:125).
> 120 static inline void
> 121 __rb_change_child(struct rb_node *old, struct rb_node *new,
> 122 struct rb_node *parent, struct rb_root *root)
> 123 {
> 124 if (parent) {
> 125 if (parent->rb_left == old)
> 126 parent->rb_left = new;
> 127 else
> 128 parent->rb_right = new;
> 129 } else
Hum, the data looks correct from the first look and the stack trace
doesn't show anything unusual either so it looks like a false positive to
me. It may deserve a closer investigation though.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-06-17 10:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-06-16 11:33 [BUG] fs: inotify_handle_event() reading un-init memory Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-06-16 13:52 ` Jan Kara
2015-06-16 20:22 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-06-17 8:13 ` Jan Kara
2015-06-17 9:57 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-06-17 10:17 ` Jan Kara
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).