From: Jerome Glisse <j.glisse@gmail.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, boaz@plexistor.com,
riel@redhat.com, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
david@fromorbit.com, mingo@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
mgorman@suse.de, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
hch@lst.de
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/7] x86, mm: ZONE_DEVICE for "device memory"
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 17:37:15 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150814213714.GA3265@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150813035005.36913.77364.stgit@otcpl-skl-sds-2.jf.intel.com>
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 11:50:05PM -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
> While pmem is usable as a block device or via DAX mappings to userspace
> there are several usage scenarios that can not target pmem due to its
> lack of struct page coverage. In preparation for "hot plugging" pmem
> into the vmemmap add ZONE_DEVICE as a new zone to tag these pages
> separately from the ones that are subject to standard page allocations.
> Importantly "device memory" can be removed at will by userspace
> unbinding the driver of the device.
>
> Having a separate zone prevents allocation and otherwise marks these
> pages that are distinct from typical uniform memory. Device memory has
> different lifetime and performance characteristics than RAM. However,
> since we have run out of ZONES_SHIFT bits this functionality currently
> depends on sacrificing ZONE_DMA.
>
> arch_add_memory() is reorganized a bit in preparation for a new
> arch_add_dev_memory() api, for now there is no functional change to the
> memory hotplug code.
>
> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/Kconfig | 13 +++++++++++++
> arch/x86/mm/init_64.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> include/linux/mmzone.h | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> mm/memory_hotplug.c | 5 ++++-
> mm/page_alloc.c | 3 +++
> 5 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> index b3a1a5d77d92..64829b17980b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> @@ -308,6 +308,19 @@ config ZONE_DMA
>
> If unsure, say Y.
>
> +config ZONE_DEVICE
> + bool "Device memory (pmem, etc...) hotplug support" if EXPERT
> + default !ZONE_DMA
> + depends on !ZONE_DMA
> + help
> + Device memory hotplug support allows for establishing pmem,
> + or other device driver discovered memory regions, in the
> + memmap. This allows pfn_to_page() lookups of otherwise
> + "device-physical" addresses which is needed for using a DAX
> + mapping in an O_DIRECT operation, among other things.
> +
> + If FS_DAX is enabled, then say Y.
> +
> config SMP
> bool "Symmetric multi-processing support"
> ---help---
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
> index 3fba623e3ba5..94f0fa56f0ed 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
> @@ -683,15 +683,8 @@ static void update_end_of_memory_vars(u64 start, u64 size)
> }
> }
>
> -/*
> - * Memory is added always to NORMAL zone. This means you will never get
> - * additional DMA/DMA32 memory.
> - */
> -int arch_add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size)
> +static int __arch_add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size, struct zone *zone)
> {
> - struct pglist_data *pgdat = NODE_DATA(nid);
> - struct zone *zone = pgdat->node_zones +
> - zone_for_memory(nid, start, size, ZONE_NORMAL);
> unsigned long start_pfn = start >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> unsigned long nr_pages = size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> int ret;
> @@ -701,11 +694,28 @@ int arch_add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size)
> ret = __add_pages(nid, zone, start_pfn, nr_pages);
> WARN_ON_ONCE(ret);
>
> - /* update max_pfn, max_low_pfn and high_memory */
> - update_end_of_memory_vars(start, size);
> + /*
> + * Update max_pfn, max_low_pfn and high_memory, unless we added
> + * "device memory" which should not effect max_pfn
> + */
> + if (!is_dev_zone(zone))
> + update_end_of_memory_vars(start, size);
What is the rational for not updating max_pfn, max_low_pfn, ... ?
Cheers,
Jerome
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-14 21:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-13 3:50 [RFC PATCH 0/7] 'struct page' driver for persistent memory Dan Williams
2015-08-13 3:50 ` [RFC PATCH 1/7] x86, mm: ZONE_DEVICE for "device memory" Dan Williams
2015-08-14 21:37 ` Jerome Glisse [this message]
2015-08-14 21:52 ` Dan Williams
2015-08-14 22:06 ` Jerome Glisse
2015-08-14 22:33 ` Dan Williams
2015-08-15 2:11 ` Dan Williams
2015-08-17 21:45 ` Jerome Glisse
2015-08-18 0:46 ` Dan Williams
2015-08-18 16:55 ` Jerome Glisse
2015-08-18 17:23 ` Dan Williams
2015-08-18 19:06 ` Jerome Glisse
2015-08-20 0:49 ` Dan Williams
2015-08-15 8:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-08-21 15:02 ` Dan Williams
2015-08-21 15:15 ` Jerome Glisse
2015-08-15 13:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-08-13 3:50 ` [RFC PATCH 2/7] x86, mm: introduce struct vmem_altmap Dan Williams
2015-08-13 3:50 ` [RFC PATCH 3/7] x86, mm: arch_add_dev_memory() Dan Williams
2015-08-13 3:50 ` [RFC PATCH 4/7] mm: register_dev_memmap() Dan Williams
2015-08-15 9:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-08-13 3:50 ` [RFC PATCH 5/7] libnvdimm, e820: make CONFIG_X86_PMEM_LEGACY a tristate option Dan Williams
2015-08-15 9:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-08-15 15:28 ` Dan Williams
2015-08-15 15:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-08-15 16:04 ` Dan Williams
2015-08-17 15:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-08-17 15:32 ` Dan Williams
2015-08-13 3:50 ` [RFC PATCH 6/7] libnvdimm, pfn: 'struct page' provider infrastructure Dan Williams
2015-08-13 3:50 ` [RFC PATCH 7/7] libnvdimm, pmem: 'struct page' for pmem Dan Williams
2015-08-15 9:01 ` [RFC PATCH 0/7] 'struct page' driver for persistent memory Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150814213714.GA3265@gmail.com \
--to=j.glisse@gmail.com \
--cc=boaz@plexistor.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).