From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 3/4] mm: pack compound_dtor and compound_order into one word in struct page
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 21:22:14 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150818182214.GA21383@node.dhcp.inet.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150818154259.GL5033@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 05:43:00PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 17-08-15 18:09:04, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > The patch halves space occupied by compound_dtor and compound_order in
> > struct page.
> >
> > For compound_order, it's trivial long -> int/short conversion.
> >
> > For get_compound_page_dtor(), we now use hardcoded table for destructor
> > lookup and store its index in the struct page instead of direct pointer
> > to destructor. It shouldn't be a big trouble to maintain the table: we
> > have only two destructor and NULL currently.
> >
> > This patch free up one word in tail pages for reuse. This is preparation
> > for the next patch.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
>
> [...]
> > @@ -145,8 +143,13 @@ struct page {
> > */
> > /* First tail page of compound page */
> > struct {
> > - compound_page_dtor *compound_dtor;
> > - unsigned long compound_order;
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
> > + unsigned int compound_dtor;
> > + unsigned int compound_order;
> > +#else
> > + unsigned short int compound_dtor;
> > + unsigned short int compound_order;
> > +#endif
> > };
>
> Why do we need this ifdef? We can go with short for both 32b and 64b
> AFAICS.
My assumption was that operations on ints can be faster on some
[micro]arhictectures. I'm not sure if it's ever true.
> We do not use compound_order for anything else than the order, right?
Right.
> While I am looking at this, it seems we are jugling with type for order
> quite a lot - int, unsing int and even unsigned long.
Yeah. It's mess. I'll check if I can fix anything of it in v3.
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-18 18:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-17 15:09 [PATCHv2 0/4] Fix compound_head() race Kirill A. Shutemov
2015-08-17 15:09 ` [PATCHv2 1/4] mm: drop page->slab_page Kirill A. Shutemov
2015-08-18 0:43 ` David Rientjes
2015-08-17 15:09 ` [PATCHv2 2/4] zsmalloc: use page->private instead of page->first_page Kirill A. Shutemov
2015-08-25 1:49 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-08-25 2:17 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-08-25 17:10 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2015-08-17 15:09 ` [PATCHv2 3/4] mm: pack compound_dtor and compound_order into one word in struct page Kirill A. Shutemov
2015-08-17 22:59 ` Hugh Dickins
2015-08-18 15:43 ` Michal Hocko
2015-08-18 18:22 ` Kirill A. Shutemov [this message]
2015-08-18 16:05 ` Michal Hocko
2015-08-18 18:22 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2015-08-17 15:09 ` [PATCHv2 4/4] mm: make compound_head() robust Kirill A. Shutemov
2015-08-18 11:20 ` Michal Hocko
2015-08-18 16:41 ` Michal Hocko
2015-08-18 18:24 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150818182214.GA21383@node.dhcp.inet.fi \
--to=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).