From: "George Spelvin" <linux@horizon.com>
To: linux@horizon.com, mingo@kernel.org
Cc: dave@sr71.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk, peterz@infradead.org, riel@redhat.com,
rientjes@google.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] mm/vmalloc: Cache the /proc/meminfo vmalloc statistics
Date: 23 Aug 2015 02:46:03 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150823064603.14050.qmail@ns.horizon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150823060443.GA9882@gmail.com>
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
> I think this is too complex.
>
> How about something simple like the patch below (on top of the third patch)?
> It makes the vmalloc info transactional - /proc/meminfo will always print a
> consistent set of numbers. (Not that we really care about races there, but it
> looks really simple to solve so why not.)
Looks like a huge simplification!
It needs a comment about the approximate nature of the locking and
the obvious race conditions:
1) The first caller to get_vmalloc_info() clears vmap_info_changed
before updating vmap_info_cache, so a second caller is likely to
get stale data for the duration of a calc_vmalloc_info call.
2) Although unlikely, it's possible for two threads to race calling
calc_vmalloc_info, and the one that computes fresher data updates
the cache first, so the later write leaves stale data.
Other issues:
3) Me, I'd make vmap_info_changed a bool, for documentation more than
any space saving.
4) I wish there were a trylock version of write_seqlock, so we could
avoid blocking entirely. (You *could* hand-roll it, but that eats
into the simplicity.)
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-23 6:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-23 4:48 [PATCH 0/3] mm/vmalloc: Cache the /proc/meminfo vmalloc statistics George Spelvin
2015-08-23 6:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-08-23 6:46 ` George Spelvin [this message]
2015-08-23 8:17 ` [PATCH 3/3 v3] mm/vmalloc: Cache the vmalloc memory info Ingo Molnar
2015-08-23 20:53 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2015-08-24 6:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-08-24 8:39 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2015-08-23 21:56 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2015-08-24 7:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-08-25 16:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-08-25 17:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-08-24 1:04 ` George Spelvin
2015-08-24 7:34 ` [PATCH 3/3 v4] " Ingo Molnar
2015-08-24 7:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-08-24 7:50 ` [PATCH 3/3 v5] " Ingo Molnar
2015-08-24 12:54 ` George Spelvin
2015-08-25 9:56 ` [PATCH 3/3 v6] " Ingo Molnar
2015-08-25 10:36 ` George Spelvin
2015-08-25 12:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-08-25 14:19 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2015-08-25 15:11 ` George Spelvin
2015-08-24 13:11 ` [PATCH 3/3 v4] " John Stoffel
2015-08-24 15:11 ` George Spelvin
2015-08-24 15:55 ` John Stoffel
2015-08-25 12:46 ` [PATCH 3/3 v3] " Peter Zijlstra
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-08-22 10:44 [PATCH 0/3] mm/vmalloc: Cache the /proc/meminfo vmalloc statistics Ingo Molnar
2015-08-22 14:36 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150823064603.14050.qmail@ns.horizon.com \
--to=linux@horizon.com \
--cc=dave@sr71.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).