From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 0/7] Fix compound_head() race
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 15:43:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150904134353.GD31717@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1441283758-92774-1-git-send-email-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 03:35:51PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> Kirill A. Shutemov (7):
> mm: drop page->slab_page
> slub: use page->rcu_head instead of page->lru plus cast
> zsmalloc: use page->private instead of page->first_page
> mm: pack compound_dtor and compound_order into one word in struct page
> mm: make compound_head() robust
> mm: use 'unsigned int' for page order
> mm: use 'unsigned int' for compound_dtor/compound_order on 64BIT
Reviewed-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
The only other alternative solution that doesn't require finding a bit
zero at the LSB in a field unused in tail pages, is to drop both
PG_head and PG_tail, and reserve 4 bits from page->flags.
This means a net loss of 2 bits from page->flags (and loss of 3 bits
if !CONFIG_PAGEFLAGS_EXTENDED), but then everything becomes simple and
there's no need of finding a LSB field that is guaranteed zero at all
times.
With those 4 bits, you clear them for not compound pages. When you
create a compound page you encode the compound_order in those 4 bits
of page->flags, equal for for all head and tail
pages. compound_order() then becomes atomically available for tail
pages too and compound_order goes away from struct page along with
first_page (and there's no need to add a compound_head).
In PageCompound you read the 4 bits, if they're not all zero it's
compound, otherwise it's not.
In PageHead/Tail, if the 4 bits are all zero it's not head/tail,
otherwise you do the math on the page_to_pfn(page). If the pfn is
naturally aligned against the order encoded in the 4 bits "!(pfn &
(1<<order)-1)" it's a head, otherwise it's a tail.
If it's a tail, for the compound_head then it's just a matter of doing
"return page - (pfn & ((1<<order)-1)" (no need of pfn_to_page).
This leverages the physical natural alignment of compound pages for
all orders. It'd cover up to CONFIG_FORCE_MAX_ZONEORDER == 16
(128MBytes of order 15 with PAGE_SIZE 4kb).
page_to_pfn can actually be replaced with
(&NODE_DATA(page_to_nid(page))->node_mem_map-page) which is faster as
page_to_nid only need to accesses page->flags which is already in
L1. So then it costs only one cacheline access in the pgdat and a sub.
Because of the two (or three) additional bits taken out of page->flags
I doubt it's viable on 32bit, but I thought I'd mention it just in case.
Thanks,
Andrea
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-04 13:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-03 12:35 [PATCHv5 0/7] Fix compound_head() race Kirill A. Shutemov
2015-09-03 12:35 ` [PATCHv5 1/7] mm: drop page->slab_page Kirill A. Shutemov
2015-09-07 5:00 ` Alexander Duyck
2015-09-07 12:19 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2015-09-03 12:35 ` [PATCHv5 2/7] slub: use page->rcu_head instead of page->lru plus cast Kirill A. Shutemov
2015-09-03 12:35 ` [PATCHv5 3/7] zsmalloc: use page->private instead of page->first_page Kirill A. Shutemov
2015-09-03 12:35 ` [PATCHv5 4/7] mm: pack compound_dtor and compound_order into one word in struct page Kirill A. Shutemov
2015-09-10 9:41 ` Vlastimil Babka
2015-09-03 12:35 ` [PATCHv5 5/7] mm: make compound_head() robust Kirill A. Shutemov
2015-09-10 10:54 ` Vlastimil Babka
2015-09-11 13:35 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2015-09-14 13:31 ` Vlastimil Babka
2015-09-03 12:35 ` [PATCHv5 6/7] mm: use 'unsigned int' for page order Kirill A. Shutemov
2015-09-10 11:04 ` Vlastimil Babka
2015-09-03 12:35 ` [PATCHv5 7/7] mm: use 'unsigned int' for compound_dtor/compound_order on 64BIT Kirill A. Shutemov
2015-09-10 11:34 ` Vlastimil Babka
2015-09-04 13:43 ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150904134353.GD31717@redhat.com \
--to=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).