From: Yaowei Bai <bywxiaobai@163.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, mgorman@suse.de, mhocko@kernel.org,
js1304@gmail.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
alexander.h.duyck@redhat.com, sasha.levin@oracle.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mm/page_alloc: add a helper function to check page before alloc/free
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 21:28:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150909132848.GA3935@bbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55EF34AB.5040003@suse.cz>
On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 09:19:07PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 08/27/2015 02:51 PM, Yaowei Bai wrote:
> > The major portion of check_new_page() and free_pages_check() are same,
> > introduce a helper function check_one_page() for simplification.
> >
> > Change in v3:
> > - add the missed __PG_HWPOISON check per Michal Hocko
> > Change in v2:
> > - use bad_flags as parameter directly per Michal Hocko
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yaowei Bai <bywxiaobai@163.com>
> > ---
> > mm/page_alloc.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------------
> > 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > index 5b5240b..0c9c82a 100644
> > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > @@ -707,10 +707,9 @@ out:
> > zone->free_area[order].nr_free++;
> > }
> >
> > -static inline int free_pages_check(struct page *page)
> > +static inline int check_one_page(struct page *page, unsigned long bad_flags)
> > {
> > const char *bad_reason = NULL;
> > - unsigned long bad_flags = 0;
> >
> > if (unlikely(page_mapcount(page)))
> > bad_reason = "nonzero mapcount";
> > @@ -718,9 +717,16 @@ static inline int free_pages_check(struct page *page)
> > bad_reason = "non-NULL mapping";
> > if (unlikely(atomic_read(&page->_count) != 0))
> > bad_reason = "nonzero _count";
> > - if (unlikely(page->flags & PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_FREE)) {
> > - bad_reason = "PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_FREE flag(s) set";
> > - bad_flags = PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_FREE;
> > + if (bad_flags == PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_PREP) {
> > + if (unlikely(page->flags & bad_flags))
> > + bad_reason = "PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_PREP flag set";
> > + if (unlikely(page->flags & __PG_HWPOISON)) {
> > + bad_reason = "HWPoisoned (hardware-corrupted)";
> > + bad_flags = __PG_HWPOISON;
> > + }
>
> Before, HWPOISON was checked first, which means that it had lower priority than
> PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_PREP (counter-intuitively). I can see why you switched that
> though. You could fix that by changing the second nested "if" to "else if", but
> I guess it doesn't matter. The "priorities" don't seem to be carefuly sorted anyway.
OK, so let's leave as it is and see other guys' ideas. If there is any objection i will
resend with fixing the priority.
>
> bloat-o-meter looks favorably with my gcc, although there shouldn't be a real
> reason for it, as the inlining didn't change:
>
> add/remove: 1/1 grow/shrink: 1/1 up/down: 285/-336 (-51)
> function old new delta
> bad_page - 276 +276
> get_page_from_freelist 2521 2530 +9
> free_pages_prepare 745 667 -78
> bad_page.part 258 - -258
>
> With that,
>
> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Thanks.
>
> > + } else if (bad_flags == PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_FREE) {
> > + if (unlikely(page->flags & bad_flags))
> > + bad_reason = "PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_FREE flag set";
> > }
> > #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
> > if (unlikely(page->mem_cgroup))
> > @@ -730,6 +736,17 @@ static inline int free_pages_check(struct page *page)
> > bad_page(page, bad_reason, bad_flags);
> > return 1;
> > }
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline int free_pages_check(struct page *page)
> > +{
> > + int ret = 0;
> > +
> > + ret = check_one_page(page, PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_FREE);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > page_cpupid_reset_last(page);
> > if (page->flags & PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_PREP)
> > page->flags &= ~PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_PREP;
> > @@ -1287,32 +1304,7 @@ static inline void expand(struct zone *zone, struct page *page,
> > */
> > static inline int check_new_page(struct page *page)
> > {
> > - const char *bad_reason = NULL;
> > - unsigned long bad_flags = 0;
> > -
> > - if (unlikely(page_mapcount(page)))
> > - bad_reason = "nonzero mapcount";
> > - if (unlikely(page->mapping != NULL))
> > - bad_reason = "non-NULL mapping";
> > - if (unlikely(atomic_read(&page->_count) != 0))
> > - bad_reason = "nonzero _count";
> > - if (unlikely(page->flags & __PG_HWPOISON)) {
> > - bad_reason = "HWPoisoned (hardware-corrupted)";
> > - bad_flags = __PG_HWPOISON;
> > - }
> > - if (unlikely(page->flags & PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_PREP)) {
> > - bad_reason = "PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_PREP flag set";
> > - bad_flags = PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_PREP;
> > - }
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
> > - if (unlikely(page->mem_cgroup))
> > - bad_reason = "page still charged to cgroup";
> > -#endif
> > - if (unlikely(bad_reason)) {
> > - bad_page(page, bad_reason, bad_flags);
> > - return 1;
> > - }
> > - return 0;
> > + return check_one_page(page, PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_PREP);
> > }
> >
> > static int prep_new_page(struct page *page, unsigned int order, gfp_t gfp_flags,
> >
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-09 13:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-27 12:51 [PATCH v3] mm/page_alloc: add a helper function to check page before alloc/free Yaowei Bai
2015-09-08 19:19 ` Vlastimil Babka
2015-09-09 13:28 ` Yaowei Bai [this message]
2015-09-09 13:39 ` Vlastimil Babka
2015-09-09 14:41 ` Yaowei Bai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150909132848.GA3935@bbox \
--to=bywxiaobai@163.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexander.h.duyck@redhat.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=js1304@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=sasha.levin@oracle.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).