Re: [PATCH] mm: memcontrol: fix order calculation in try_charge()

[Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>]

On Tue 15-09-15 14:05:57, Jerome Marchand wrote:
> Since commit <6539cc05386> (mm: memcontrol: fold mem_cgroup_do_charge()),
> the order to pass to mem_cgroup_oom() is calculated by passing the number
> of pages to get_order() instead of the expected  size in bytes. AFAICT,
> it only affects the value displayed in the oom warning message.
> This patch fix this.

We haven't noticed that just because the OOM is enabled only for page
faults of order-0 (single page) and get_order work just fine. Thanks for
noticing this. If we ever start triggering OOM on different orders this
would be broken.
 
> Signed-off-by: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>

Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>

Btw. a quick git grep shows that at least gart_iommu_init is using
number of pages as well. I haven't checked it does that intentionally,
though.

Thanks!

> ---
>  mm/memcontrol.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 1742a2d..91bf094 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -2032,7 +2032,8 @@ retry:
>  
>  	mem_cgroup_events(mem_over_limit, MEMCG_OOM, 1);
>  
> -	mem_cgroup_oom(mem_over_limit, gfp_mask, get_order(nr_pages));
> +	mem_cgroup_oom(mem_over_limit, gfp_mask,
> +		       get_order(nr_pages * PAGE_SIZE));
>  nomem:
>  	if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_NOFAIL))
>  		return -ENOMEM;
> -- 
> 1.9.3

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>