From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qg0-f53.google.com (mail-qg0-f53.google.com [209.85.192.53]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0005B6B0253 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 15:34:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: by qgx61 with SMTP id 61so2496022qgx.3 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 12:34:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e19.ny.us.ibm.com (e19.ny.us.ibm.com. [129.33.205.209]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p91si3074847qkp.57.2015.09.22.12.34.51 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 22 Sep 2015 12:34:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from /spool/local by e19.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 15:34:51 -0400 Received: from b01cxnp23032.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01cxnp23032.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.198.27]) by d01dlp03.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0F48C9003C for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 15:25:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (d01av01.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.215]) by b01cxnp23032.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id t8MJYlD610747962 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 19:34:47 GMT Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d01av01.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id t8MJYkL3002202 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 15:34:47 -0400 Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 01:06:20 +0530 From: Raghavendra K T Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] powerpc:numa Do not allocate bootmem memory for non existing nodes Message-ID: <20150922193620.GA6942@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: Raghavendra K T References: <1442282917-16893-1-git-send-email-raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1442282917-16893-3-git-send-email-raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1442899743.18408.5.camel@ellerman.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1442899743.18408.5.camel@ellerman.id.au> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Michael Ellerman Cc: Raghavendra K T , benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org, anton@samba.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, nacc@linux.vnet.ibm.com, gkurz@linux.vnet.ibm.com, grant.likely@linaro.org, nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com, vdavydov@parallels.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org * Michael Ellerman [2015-09-22 15:29:03]: > On Tue, 2015-09-15 at 07:38 +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote: > > > > ... nothing > > Sure this patch looks obvious, but please give me a changelog that proves > you've thought about it thoroughly. > > For example is it OK to use for_each_node() at this point in boot? Is there any > historical reason why we did it with a hard coded loop? If so what has changed. > What systems have you tested on? etc. etc. > > cheers Hi Michael, resending the patches with the changelog. Please note that the patch is in -mm tree already. ---8<---