From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@google.com>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 26/26] x86, pkeys: Documentation
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 08:09:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151002060904.GA30051@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <560DB4A6.6050107@sr71.net>
* Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net> wrote:
> On 10/01/2015 01:39 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 4:17 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
> >> So could we try to add an (opt-in) kernel option that enables this transparently
> >> and automatically for all PROT_EXEC && !PROT_WRITE mappings, without any
> >> user-space changes and syscalls necessary?
> >
> > I would like this very much. :)
>
> Here it is in a quite fugly form (well, it's not opt-in). Init crashes
> if I boot with this, though.
>
> I'll see if I can turn it in to a bit more of an opt-in and see what's
> actually going wrong.
So the reality of modern Linux distros is that, according to some limited
strace-ing around, pure PROT_EXEC usage does not seem to exist: 99% of executable
mappings are mapped via PROT_EXEC|PROT_READ.
So the most usable kernel testing approach would be to enable these types of pkeys
for a child task via some mechanism and inherit it to all children (including
inheriting it over non-suid exec) - but not to any other task.
You could hijack a new personality bit just for debug purposes - see the (totally
untested) patch below.
Depending on user-space's assumptions it might not end up being anything usable we
can apply, but it would be a great testing tool if it worked to a certain degree.
I.e. allow the system to boot in without pkeys set for any task, then set the
personality of a shell process to PER_LINUX_PKEYS and see which binaries (if any!)
will start up without segfaulting.
This way you don't have to debug SystemD, which is extremely fragile and
passive-aggressive towards kernels that don't behave in precisely the fashion
under which SystemD is being developed.
Thanks,
Ingo
========>
Absolutely-Not-Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
include/uapi/linux/personality.h | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/personality.h b/include/uapi/linux/personality.h
index aa169c4339d2..bead47213419 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/personality.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/personality.h
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
* These occupy the top three bytes.
*/
enum {
+ PROT_READ_EXEC_HACK = 0x0010000, /* PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC == PROT_EXEC hack */
UNAME26 = 0x0020000,
ADDR_NO_RANDOMIZE = 0x0040000, /* disable randomization of VA space */
FDPIC_FUNCPTRS = 0x0080000, /* userspace function ptrs point to descriptors
@@ -41,6 +42,7 @@ enum {
enum {
PER_LINUX = 0x0000,
PER_LINUX_32BIT = 0x0000 | ADDR_LIMIT_32BIT,
+ PER_LINUX_PKEYS = 0x0000 | PROT_READ_EXEC_HACK,
PER_LINUX_FDPIC = 0x0000 | FDPIC_FUNCPTRS,
PER_SVR4 = 0x0001 | STICKY_TIMEOUTS | MMAP_PAGE_ZERO,
PER_SVR3 = 0x0002 | STICKY_TIMEOUTS | SHORT_INODE,
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-02 6:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 86+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-16 17:49 [PATCH 00/26] [RFCv2] x86: Memory Protection Keys Dave Hansen
2015-09-16 17:49 ` [PATCH 02/26] x86, pkeys: Add Kconfig option Dave Hansen
2015-09-16 17:49 ` [PATCH 04/26] x86, pku: define new CR4 bit Dave Hansen
2015-09-16 17:49 ` [PATCH 01/26] x86, fpu: add placeholder for Processor Trace XSAVE state Dave Hansen
2015-09-16 17:49 ` [PATCH 03/26] x86, pkeys: cpuid bit definition Dave Hansen
2015-09-16 17:49 ` [PATCH 06/26] x86, pkeys: PTE bits for storing protection key Dave Hansen
2015-09-16 17:49 ` [PATCH 05/26] x86, pkey: add PKRU xsave fields and data structure(s) Dave Hansen
2015-09-22 19:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-09-22 19:58 ` Dave Hansen
2015-09-16 17:49 ` [PATCH 07/26] x86, pkeys: new page fault error code bit: PF_PK Dave Hansen
2015-09-16 17:49 ` [PATCH 11/26] x86, pkeys: add functions for set/fetch PKRU Dave Hansen
2015-09-22 20:05 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-09-22 20:22 ` Dave Hansen
2015-09-16 17:49 ` [PATCH 10/26] x86, pkeys: notify userspace about protection key faults Dave Hansen
2015-09-22 20:03 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-09-22 20:21 ` Dave Hansen
2015-09-22 20:27 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-09-22 20:29 ` Dave Hansen
2015-09-23 8:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-09-24 9:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-09-24 9:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-09-24 17:41 ` Dave Hansen
2015-09-25 7:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-09-25 23:18 ` Dave Hansen
2015-09-26 6:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-09-27 22:39 ` Dave Hansen
2015-09-28 5:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-09-24 17:15 ` Dave Hansen
2015-09-28 19:25 ` Christian Borntraeger
2015-09-28 19:32 ` Dave Hansen
2015-09-16 17:49 ` [PATCH 08/26] x86, pkeys: store protection in high VMA flags Dave Hansen
2015-09-16 17:49 ` [PATCH 09/26] x86, pkeys: arch-specific protection bits Dave Hansen
2015-09-16 17:49 ` [PATCH 14/26] x86, pkeys: check VMAs and PTEs for protection keys Dave Hansen
2015-09-16 17:49 ` [PATCH 12/26] mm: factor out VMA fault permission checking Dave Hansen
2015-09-16 17:49 ` [PATCH 13/26] mm: simplify get_user_pages() PTE bit handling Dave Hansen
2015-09-16 17:49 ` [PATCH 16/26] x86, pkeys: dump PKRU with other kernel registers Dave Hansen
2015-09-16 17:49 ` [PATCH 17/26] x86, pkeys: dump PTE pkey in /proc/pid/smaps Dave Hansen
2015-09-16 17:49 ` [PATCH 15/26] x86, pkeys: optimize fault handling in access_error() Dave Hansen
2015-09-16 17:49 ` [PATCH 20/26] [NEWSYSCALL] mm: implement new mprotect_pkey() system call Dave Hansen
2015-09-16 17:49 ` [PATCH 19/26] [NEWSYSCALL] mm, multi-arch: pass a protection key in to calc_vm_flag_bits() Dave Hansen
2015-09-16 17:49 ` [PATCH 18/26] x86, pkeys: add Kconfig prompt to existing config option Dave Hansen
2015-09-16 17:49 ` [PATCH 21/26] [NEWSYSCALL] x86: wire up mprotect_key() system call Dave Hansen
2015-09-16 17:49 ` [PATCH 22/26] [HIJACKPROT] mm: Pass the 4-bit protection key in via PROT_ bits to syscalls Dave Hansen
2015-09-16 17:49 ` [PATCH 23/26] [HIJACKPROT] x86, pkeys: add x86 version of arch_validate_prot() Dave Hansen
2015-09-16 17:49 ` [PATCH 25/26] x86, pkeys: actually enable Memory Protection Keys in CPU Dave Hansen
2015-09-16 17:49 ` [PATCH 24/26] [HIJACKPROT] x86, pkeys: mask off pkeys bits in mprotect() Dave Hansen
2015-09-16 17:49 ` [PATCH 26/26] x86, pkeys: Documentation Dave Hansen
2015-09-20 8:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-09-21 4:34 ` Dave Hansen
2015-09-24 9:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-09-24 19:10 ` Dave Hansen
2015-09-24 19:17 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-09-25 7:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-09-25 6:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-10-01 11:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-10-01 20:39 ` Kees Cook
2015-10-01 20:45 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-10-02 6:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-10-02 17:50 ` Dave Hansen
2015-10-03 7:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-10-06 23:28 ` Dave Hansen
2015-10-07 7:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-10-16 15:12 ` Dave Hansen
2015-10-21 18:55 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-10-21 19:11 ` Dave Hansen
2015-10-21 23:22 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-10-01 20:58 ` Dave Hansen
2015-10-01 22:33 ` Dave Hansen
2015-10-01 22:35 ` Kees Cook
2015-10-01 22:39 ` Dave Hansen
2015-10-01 22:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-10-01 22:56 ` Dave Hansen
2015-10-02 1:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-10-02 18:08 ` Dave Hansen
2015-10-02 7:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-10-03 6:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-10-02 11:49 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-10-02 11:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-10-02 12:14 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-10-03 6:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-10-01 22:57 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-10-02 6:09 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2015-10-03 8:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-10-07 20:24 ` Dave Hansen
2015-10-07 20:39 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-10-07 20:47 ` Dave Hansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151002060904.GA30051@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave@sr71.net \
--cc=keescook@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).