From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
oleg@redhat.com, kwalker@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
hannes@cmpxchg.org, vdavydov@parallels.com, skozina@redhat.com,
mgorman@suse.de, riel@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm,vmscan: Use accurate values for zone_reclaimable() checks
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 19:36:30 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151023103630.GA4170@mtj.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151023083316.GB2410@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Hello, Michal.
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 10:33:16AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> Ohh, OK I can see wq_worker_sleeping now. I've missed your point in
> other email, sorry about that. But now I am wondering whether this
> is an intended behavior. The documentation says:
This is.
> WQ_MEM_RECLAIM
>
> All wq which might be used in the memory reclaim paths _MUST_
> have this flag set. The wq is guaranteed to have at least one
> execution context regardless of memory pressure.
>
> Which doesn't seem to be true currently, right? Now I can see your patch
It is true.
> to introduce WQ_IMMEDIATE but I am wondering which WQ_MEM_RECLAIM users
> could do without WQ_IMMEDIATE? I mean all current workers might be
> looping in the page allocator and it seems possible that WQ_MEM_RECLAIM
> work items might be waiting behind them so they cannot help to relieve
> the memory pressure. This doesn't sound right to me. Or I am completely
> confused and still fail to understand what is WQ_MEM_RECLAIM supposed to
> be used for.
It guarantees that there always is enough execution resource to
execute a work item from that workqueue. The problem here is not lack
of execution resource but concurrency management misunderstanding the
situation. This also can be fixed by teaching concurrency management
to be a bit smarter - e.g. if a work item is burning a lot of CPU
cycles continuously or pool hasn't finished a work item over a certain
amount of time, automatically ignore the in-flight work item for the
purpose of concurrency management; however, this sort of inter-work
item busy waits are so extremely rare and undesirable that I'm not
sure the added complexity would be worthwhile.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-23 10:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-21 12:26 [PATCH] mm,vmscan: Use accurate values for zone_reclaimable() checks Tetsuo Handa
2015-10-21 13:03 ` Michal Hocko
2015-10-21 14:22 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-10-21 14:33 ` Michal Hocko
2015-10-21 14:49 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-10-21 14:55 ` Michal Hocko
2015-10-21 15:39 ` Tetsuo Handa
2015-10-21 17:16 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-10-22 11:37 ` Tetsuo Handa
2015-10-22 13:39 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-10-22 14:09 ` Tejun Heo
2015-10-22 14:21 ` Tejun Heo
2015-10-22 14:23 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-10-22 14:24 ` Tejun Heo
2015-10-22 14:25 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-10-22 14:33 ` Tejun Heo
2015-10-22 14:41 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-10-22 15:14 ` Tejun Heo
2015-10-23 4:26 ` Tejun Heo
2015-11-02 15:01 ` Michal Hocko
2015-11-02 19:20 ` Tejun Heo
2015-11-03 2:32 ` Tetsuo Handa
2015-11-03 19:43 ` Tejun Heo
2015-11-05 14:59 ` Tetsuo Handa
2015-11-05 17:45 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-11-06 0:16 ` Tejun Heo
2015-11-11 15:44 ` Michal Hocko
2015-11-11 16:03 ` Michal Hocko
2015-10-22 14:22 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-10-22 15:06 ` Michal Hocko
2015-10-22 15:15 ` Tejun Heo
2015-10-22 15:33 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-10-23 8:37 ` Michal Hocko
2015-10-23 11:43 ` Make vmstat deferrable again (was Re: [PATCH] mm,vmscan: Use accurate values for zone_reclaimable() checks) Christoph Lameter
2015-10-23 12:07 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-10-23 14:12 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-10-23 14:49 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-10-23 16:10 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-10-22 15:35 ` [PATCH] mm,vmscan: Use accurate values for zone_reclaimable() checks Michal Hocko
2015-10-22 15:37 ` Tejun Heo
2015-10-22 15:49 ` Michal Hocko
2015-10-22 18:42 ` Tejun Heo
2015-10-22 21:42 ` [PATCH] mm,vmscan: Use accurate values for zone_reclaimable()checks Tetsuo Handa
2015-10-22 22:47 ` Tejun Heo
2015-10-23 8:36 ` Michal Hocko
2015-10-23 10:37 ` Tejun Heo
2015-10-23 8:33 ` [PATCH] mm,vmscan: Use accurate values for zone_reclaimable() checks Michal Hocko
2015-10-23 10:36 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2015-10-23 11:11 ` Michal Hocko
2015-10-23 12:25 ` Tetsuo Handa
2015-10-23 18:23 ` Tejun Heo
2015-10-25 10:52 ` Tetsuo Handa
2015-10-25 22:47 ` Tejun Heo
2015-10-27 9:22 ` Michal Hocko
2015-10-27 10:55 ` Tejun Heo
2015-10-27 12:07 ` Michal Hocko
2015-10-23 18:21 ` Tejun Heo
2015-10-27 9:16 ` Michal Hocko
2015-10-27 10:52 ` Tejun Heo
2015-10-27 11:07 ` [PATCH] mm,vmscan: Use accurate values for zone_reclaimable()checks Tetsuo Handa
2015-10-27 11:30 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151023103630.GA4170@mtj.duckdns.org \
--to=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kwalker@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=skozina@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vdavydov@parallels.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).