linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] oom_kill: add option to disable dump_stack()
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 13:40:49 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151026174048.GP15046@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151026172012.GC9779@dhcp22.suse.cz>

Hi Michal,
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 06:20:12PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> I can see why you want to reduce the amount of information, I guess you
> have tried to reduce the loglevel but this hasn't helped because
> dump_stack uses default log level which is too low to be usable, right?
> Or are there any other reasons?

One would be that the stack trace isn't very useful for users IMHO.

> I am not sure sysctl is a good way to tell this particular restriction
> on the output. What if somebody else doesn't want to see the list of
> eligible tasks? Should we add another knob?
>
> Would it make more sense to distinguish different parts of the OOM
> report by loglevel properly?
> pr_err - killed task report
> pr_warning - oom invocation + memory info
> pr_notice - task list
> pr_info - stack trace

That'd work, yes, but I'd think the stack trace would be pr_debug. At a
point that you suspect the OOM killer isn't doing the right thing picking
up tasks and you need more information.

-- 
Aristeu

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-26 17:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-23 21:02 [PATCH] oom_kill: add option to disable dump_stack() Aristeu Rozanski
2015-10-26 16:01 ` Johannes Weiner
2015-10-26 17:46   ` Aristeu Rozanski
2015-10-26 17:20 ` Michal Hocko
2015-10-26 17:40   ` Aristeu Rozanski [this message]
2015-10-27  8:09     ` Michal Hocko
2015-10-27 15:43       ` Aristeu Rozanski
2015-10-27 16:20         ` Michal Hocko
2015-10-27 17:51           ` Aristeu Rozanski
2015-10-28 23:55             ` David Rientjes
2015-10-26 21:38 ` David Rientjes
2015-12-01 23:43 ` Andrew Morton
2015-12-02  0:02   ` David Rientjes
2015-12-02  8:18   ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151026174048.GP15046@redhat.com \
    --to=arozansk@redhat.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gthelen@google.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).