From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: hannes@cmpxchg.org
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, vdavydov@virtuozzo.com,
mhocko@suse.cz, tj@kernel.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/13] net: tcp_memcontrol: sanitize tcp memory accounting callbacks
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:28:11 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151125.112811.22762794078922115.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1448401925-22501-8-git-send-email-hannes@cmpxchg.org>
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 16:51:59 -0500
> There won't be a tcp control soft limit, so integrating the memcg code
> into the global skmem limiting scheme complicates things
> unnecessarily. Replace this with simple and clear charge and uncharge
> calls--hidden behind a jump label--to account skb memory.
>
> Note that this is not purely aesthetic: as a result of shoehorning the
> per-memcg code into the same memory accounting functions that handle
> the global level, the old code would compare the per-memcg consumption
> against the smaller of the per-memcg limit and the global limit. This
> allowed the total consumption of multiple sockets to exceed the global
> limit, as long as the individual sockets stayed within bounds. After
> this change, the code will always compare the per-memcg consumption to
> the per-memcg limit, and the global consumption to the global limit,
> and thus close this loophole.
>
> Without a soft limit, the per-memcg memory pressure state in sockets
> is generally questionable. However, we did it until now, so we
> continue to enter it when the hard limit is hit, and packets are
> dropped, to let other sockets in the cgroup know that they shouldn't
> grow their transmit windows, either. However, keep it simple in the
> new callback model and leave memory pressure lazily when the next
> packet is accepted (as opposed to doing it synchroneously when packets
> are processed). When packets are dropped, network performance will
> already be in the toilet, so that should be a reasonable trade-off.
>
> As described above, consumption is now checked on the per-memcg level
> and the global level separately. Likewise, memory pressure states are
> maintained on both the per-memcg level and the global level, and a
> socket is considered under pressure when either level asserts as much.
>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-25 16:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-24 21:51 [PATCH 00/13] mm: memcontrol: account socket memory in unified hierarchy v4 Johannes Weiner
2015-11-24 21:51 ` [PATCH 01/13] mm: memcontrol: export root_mem_cgroup Johannes Weiner
2015-11-24 21:51 ` [PATCH 02/13] net: tcp_memcontrol: properly detect ancestor socket pressure Johannes Weiner
2015-11-24 21:51 ` [PATCH 03/13] net: tcp_memcontrol: remove bogus hierarchy pressure propagation Johannes Weiner
2015-11-24 21:51 ` [PATCH 04/13] net: tcp_memcontrol: protect all tcp_memcontrol calls by jump-label Johannes Weiner
2015-11-24 21:51 ` [PATCH 05/13] net: tcp_memcontrol: remove dead per-memcg count of allocated sockets Johannes Weiner
2015-11-24 21:51 ` [PATCH 06/13] net: tcp_memcontrol: simplify the per-memcg limit access Johannes Weiner
2015-11-25 16:26 ` David Miller
2015-11-24 21:51 ` [PATCH 07/13] net: tcp_memcontrol: sanitize tcp memory accounting callbacks Johannes Weiner
2015-11-25 16:28 ` David Miller [this message]
2015-11-24 21:52 ` [PATCH 08/13] net: tcp_memcontrol: simplify linkage between socket and page counter Johannes Weiner
2015-11-25 16:28 ` David Miller
2015-11-24 21:52 ` [PATCH 09/13] mm: memcontrol: generalize the socket accounting jump label Johannes Weiner
2015-11-25 16:29 ` David Miller
2015-11-30 21:08 ` Jason Baron
2015-11-30 21:50 ` Johannes Weiner
2015-11-30 22:28 ` Jason Baron
2015-11-30 22:46 ` Johannes Weiner
2015-11-24 21:52 ` [PATCH 10/13] mm: memcontrol: do not account memory+swap on unified hierarchy Johannes Weiner
2015-11-25 16:29 ` David Miller
2015-11-24 21:52 ` [PATCH 11/13] mm: memcontrol: move socket code for unified hierarchy accounting Johannes Weiner
2015-11-25 16:29 ` David Miller
2015-11-24 21:58 ` [PATCH 12/13] mm: memcontrol: account socket memory in unified hierarchy memory controller Johannes Weiner
2015-11-25 16:30 ` David Miller
2015-11-30 10:54 ` Vladimir Davydov
2015-11-30 15:26 ` Johannes Weiner
2015-11-30 17:08 ` Vladimir Davydov
2015-11-24 21:59 ` [PATCH 13/13] mm: memcontrol: hook up vmpressure to socket pressure Johannes Weiner
2015-11-25 16:30 ` David Miller
2015-11-30 11:36 ` Vladimir Davydov
2015-11-30 15:58 ` Johannes Weiner
2015-11-30 16:13 ` Vladimir Davydov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151125.112811.22762794078922115.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vdavydov@virtuozzo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).