linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
To: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	brouer@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] slab: implement bulk free in SLAB allocator
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 16:13:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151208161357.47323842@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151208145635.GI11488@esperanza>

On Tue, 8 Dec 2015 17:56:35 +0300
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 08:15:21AM -0600, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > On Tue, 8 Dec 2015, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> > 
> > > If producers are represented by different processes, they can belong to
> > > different memory cgroups, so that objects passed to the consumer will
> > > come from different kmem caches (per memcg caches), although they are
> > > all of the same kind. This means, we must call cache_from_obj() on each
> > > object passed to kmem_cache_free_bulk() in order to free each object to
> > > the cache it was allocated from.
> > 
> > The we should change the API so that we do not specify kmem_cache on bulk
> > free. Do it like kfree without any cache spec.
> > 
> 
> Don't think so, because AFAIU the whole kmem_cache_free_bulk
> optimization comes from the assumption that objects passed to it are
> likely to share the same slab page. So they must be of the same kind,
> otherwise no optimization would be possible and the function wouldn't
> perform any better than calling kfree directly in a for-loop. By
> requiring the caller to specify the cache we emphasize this.

I agree with Vladimir here.  The performance gain for SLUB is
especially depended on that objects are likely to share the same slab
page.  It might not hurt SLAB as much.

> Enabling kmemcg might break the assumption and neglect the benefit of
> using kmem_cache_free_bulk, but it is to be expected, because kmem
> accounting does not come for free. Callers who do care about the
> performance and count every cpu cycle will surely disable it, in which
> case cache_from_obj() will be a no-op and kmem_cache_free_bulk will bear
> fruit.

True, compiler does realize, when CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM is disabled, that it
can optimize the call to cache_from_obj() away.

-- 
Best regards,
  Jesper Dangaard Brouer
  MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
  Author of http://www.iptv-analyzer.org
  LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2015-12-08 15:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-03 15:56 [RFC PATCH 0/2] slab: implement bulking for SLAB allocator Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-12-03 15:57 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] slab: implement bulk alloc in " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-12-04 10:16   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-12-04 17:10   ` Christoph Lameter
2015-12-07 10:20     ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-12-07 14:57       ` Christoph Lameter
2015-12-03 15:57 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] slab: implement bulk free " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-12-04 17:17   ` Christoph Lameter
2015-12-07 11:25     ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-12-07 14:59       ` Christoph Lameter
2015-12-08 13:39         ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-12-08 14:11           ` Christoph Lameter
2015-12-08 14:12         ` Vladimir Davydov
2015-12-08 14:15           ` Christoph Lameter
2015-12-08 14:56             ` Vladimir Davydov
2015-12-08 15:13               ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]
2015-12-08 15:32               ` Christoph Lameter
2015-12-04  9:01 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] slab: implement bulking for " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-12-08 16:18 ` [RFC PATCH V2 0/9] slab: cleanup and bulk API for SLAB Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-12-08 16:18   ` [RFC PATCH V2 1/9] mm/slab: move SLUB alloc hooks to common mm/slab.h Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-12-09 15:43     ` Christoph Lameter
2015-12-08 16:18   ` [RFC PATCH V2 2/9] mm: generalize avoid fault-inject on bootstrap kmem_cache Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-12-09  2:36     ` Joonsoo Kim
2015-12-08 16:18   ` [RFC PATCH V2 3/9] slab: use slab_pre_alloc_hook in SLAB allocator Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-12-08 16:18   ` [RFC PATCH V2 4/9] mm: kmemcheck skip object if slab allocation failed Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-12-08 16:18   ` [RFC PATCH V2 5/9] slab: use slab_post_alloc_hook in SLAB allocator Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-12-08 16:18   ` [RFC PATCH V2 6/9] slab: implement bulk alloc " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-12-08 16:18   ` [RFC PATCH V2 7/9] slab: avoid running debug SLAB code with IRQs disabled for alloc_bulk Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-12-08 16:19   ` [RFC PATCH V2 8/9] slab: implement bulk free in SLAB allocator Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-12-09 16:06     ` Christoph Lameter
2015-12-09 18:53       ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-12-09 19:41         ` Christoph Lameter
2015-12-09 20:50           ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-12-10 15:15             ` Christoph Lameter
2015-12-10 15:10           ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-12-10 15:18             ` Christoph Lameter
2015-12-10 15:26               ` Vladimir Davydov
2015-12-10 17:24                 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-12-14 15:19       ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-12-15 12:02         ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-12-08 16:19   ` [RFC PATCH V2 9/9] slab: annotate code to generate more compact asm code Jesper Dangaard Brouer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151208161357.47323842@redhat.com \
    --to=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=vdavydov@virtuozzo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).