From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
"Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
"elliott@hpe.com" <elliott@hpe.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHV5 3/3] x86, ras: Add __mcsafe_copy() function to recover from machine checks
Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2015 11:32:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151226103252.GA21988@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5FBC1CF1-095B-466D-85D6-832FBFA98364@intel.com>
On Fri, Dec 25, 2015 at 08:05:39PM +0000, Luck, Tony wrote:
> mce_in_kernel_recov() should check whether we have a fix up entry for
> the specific IP that hit the machine check before rating the severity
> as kernel recoverable.
Yeah, it is not precise right now. But this is easy - I'll change it to
a simpler version of fixup_mcexception() to iterate over the exception
table.
> If we add more functions (for different cache behaviour, or to
> optimize for specific processor model) we can make sure to put them
> all together inside begin/end labels.
Yeah, I think we can do even better than that as all the info is in the
ELF file already. For example, ENDPROC(__mcsafe_copy) generates
.type __mcsafe_copy, @function ; .size __mcsafe_copy, .-__mcsafe_copy
and there's the size of the function, I guess we can macroize something
like that or even parse the ELF file:
$ readelf --syms vmlinux | grep mcsafe
706: ffffffff819df73e 14 OBJECT LOCAL DEFAULT 11 __kstrtab___mcsafe_copy
707: ffffffff819d0e18 8 OBJECT LOCAL DEFAULT 9 __kcrctab___mcsafe_copy
56107: ffffffff819b3bb0 16 OBJECT GLOBAL DEFAULT 7 __ksymtab___mcsafe_copy
58581: ffffffff812e6d70 179 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT 1 __mcsafe_copy
62233: 000000003313f9d4 0 NOTYPE GLOBAL DEFAULT ABS __crc___mcsafe_copy
68818: ffffffff812e6e23 0 NOTYPE GLOBAL DEFAULT 1 __mcsafe_copy_end
__mcsafe_copy is of size 179 bytes:
0xffffffff812e6d70 + 179 = 0xffffffff812e6e23 which is __mcsafe_copy_end
so those labels should not really be necessary as they're global and
polluting the binary unnecessarily.
> We would run into trouble if we want to have some in-line macros for
> use from arbitrary C-code like we have for the page fault case.
Example?
> I might make the arbitrary %rax value be #PF and #MC to reflect the
> h/w fault that got us here rather than -EINVAL/-EFAULT. But that's
> just bike shedding.
Yeah, I picked those arbitrarily to show the intention.
> But now we are back to having the fault handler poke %rax again, which
> made Andy twitch before.
Andy, why is that? It makes the exception handling much simpler this way...
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-26 10:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-24 20:54 [PATCHV4 0/3] Machine check recovery when kernel accesses poison Tony Luck
2015-12-16 1:29 ` [PATCHV4 1/3] x86, ras: Add new infrastructure for machine check fixup tables Tony Luck
2015-12-16 1:29 ` [PATCHV4 2/3] x86, ras: Extend machine check recovery code to annotated ring0 areas Tony Luck
2015-12-16 1:30 ` [PATCHV4 3/3] x86, ras: Add __mcsafe_copy() function to recover from machine checks Tony Luck
2015-12-24 21:46 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-12-16 1:30 ` [PATCHV5 " Tony Luck
2015-12-25 11:49 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-12-25 20:05 ` Luck, Tony
2015-12-26 10:32 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2015-12-26 14:54 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-12-27 2:08 ` Tony Luck
2015-12-27 2:15 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-12-27 2:16 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-12-27 6:57 ` Tony Luck
2015-12-27 10:09 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-12-27 12:19 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-12-27 13:17 ` Boris Petkov
2015-12-27 13:25 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-12-27 13:33 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-12-27 13:40 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-12-27 19:04 ` Dan Williams
2015-12-27 12:18 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-12-30 23:32 ` Tony Luck
2015-12-31 20:30 ` Tony Luck
2015-12-31 21:22 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-01-01 22:19 ` Tony Luck
2016-01-03 3:40 ` Andy Lutomirski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151226103252.GA21988@pd.tnic \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=elliott@hpe.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).