From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com>
Cc: Rafael Aquini <aquini@redhat.com>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: KVM: memory ballooning bug?
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2015 08:49:10 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151227234910.GA26512@bbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALYGNiPob33YpCJTUkpaPNEqZTzg=NuN=EqCks+FMwe+CTZw5A@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 08:23:03PM +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 8:22 AM, Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> wrote:
> > During my compaction-related stuff, I encountered some problems with
> > ballooning.
> >
> > Firstly, with repeated inflating and deflating cycle, guest memory(ie,
> > cat /proc/meminfo | grep MemTotal) decreased and couldn't recover.
> >
> > When I review source code, balloon_lock should cover release_pages_balloon.
> > Otherwise, struct virtio_balloon fields could be overwritten by race
> > of fill_balloon(e,g, vb->*pfns could be critical).
>
> I guess, in original design fill and leak could be called only from single
> kernel thread which manages balloon. Seems like lock was added
> only for migration. So, locking scheme should be revisited for sure.
> Probably it's been broken by some of recent changes.
When I read git log, it seems to be broken from introdcuing
balloon_compaction.
Anyway, ballooning is out of my interest. I just wanted to go ahead
my test for a long time without any problem. ;-)
If you guys want to redesign the locking scheme fully, please do.
Until that, I can go with my test with my patches I just sent.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-27 23:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-23 5:22 KVM: memory ballooning bug? Minchan Kim
2015-12-23 11:14 ` Rafael Aquini
2015-12-23 14:17 ` Minchan Kim
2015-12-23 15:14 ` Rafael Aquini
2015-12-27 17:23 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2015-12-27 23:49 ` Minchan Kim [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151227234910.GA26512@bbox \
--to=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aquini@redhat.com \
--cc=khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru \
--cc=koct9i@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).