From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
yalin wang <yalin.wang2010@gmail.com>, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8] fs: clear file privilege bits when mmap writing
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 10:03:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160113090330.GA14630@quack.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160112190903.GA9421@www.outflux.net>
On Tue 12-01-16 11:09:04, Kees Cook wrote:
> Normally, when a user can modify a file that has setuid or setgid bits,
> those bits are cleared when they are not the file owner or a member
> of the group. This is enforced when using write and truncate but not
> when writing to a shared mmap on the file. This could allow the file
> writer to gain privileges by changing a binary without losing the
> setuid/setgid/caps bits.
>
> Changing the bits requires holding inode->i_mutex, so it cannot be done
> during the page fault (due to mmap_sem being held during the fault).
> Instead, clear the bits if PROT_WRITE is being used at mmap open time,
> or added at mprotect time.
>
> Since we can't do the check in the right place inside mmap (due to
> holding mmap_sem), we have to do it before holding mmap_sem, which
> means duplicating some checks, which have to be available to the non-MMU
> builds too.
>
> When walking VMAs during mprotect, we need to drop mmap_sem (while
> holding a file reference) and restart the walk after clearing privileges.
...
> @@ -375,6 +376,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(mprotect, unsigned long, start, size_t, len,
>
> vm_flags = calc_vm_prot_bits(prot);
>
> +restart:
> down_write(¤t->mm->mmap_sem);
>
> vma = find_vma(current->mm, start);
> @@ -416,6 +418,28 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(mprotect, unsigned long, start, size_t, len,
> goto out;
> }
>
> + /*
> + * If we're adding write permissions to a shared file,
> + * we must clear privileges (like done at mmap time),
> + * but we have to juggle the locks to avoid holding
> + * mmap_sem while holding i_mutex.
> + */
> + if ((vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED) && vma->vm_file &&
> + (newflags & VM_WRITE) && !(vma->vm_flags & VM_WRITE) &&
> + !IS_NOSEC(file_inode(vma->vm_file))) {
This code assumes that IS_NOSEC gets set for inode once file_remove_privs()
is called. However that is not true for two reasons:
1) When you are root, SUID bit doesn't get cleared and thus you cannot set
IS_NOSEC.
2) Some filesystems do not have MS_NOSEC set and for those IS_NOSEC is
never true.
So in these cases you'll loop forever.
You can check SUID bits without i_mutex so that could be done without
dropping mmap_sem but you cannot easily call security_inode_need_killpriv()
without i_mutex as that checks extended attributes (IMA) and that needs
i_mutex to be held to avoid races with someone else changing the attributes
under you.
Honestly, I don't see a way of implementing this in mprotect() which would
be reasonably elegant.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-13 9:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-12 19:09 [PATCH v8] fs: clear file privilege bits when mmap writing Kees Cook
2016-01-13 9:03 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2016-01-13 16:09 ` Kees Cook
2016-01-13 20:23 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2016-01-13 20:33 ` Kees Cook
2016-01-14 7:35 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2016-01-15 10:17 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160113090330.GA14630@quack.suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=koct9i@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=w@1wt.eu \
--cc=yalin.wang2010@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).