* [PATCH] mm: memcontrol: do not bypass slab charge if memcg is offline
@ 2016-02-04 12:17 Vladimir Davydov
2016-02-04 20:33 ` Johannes Weiner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Vladimir Davydov @ 2016-02-04 12:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: Johannes Weiner, Michal Hocko, linux-mm, linux-kernel
Slab pages are charged in two steps. First, an appropriate per memcg
cache is selected (see memcg_kmem_get_cache) basing on the current
context, then the new slab page is charged to the memory cgroup which
the selected cache was created for (see memcg_charge_slab ->
__memcg_kmem_charge_memcg). It is OK to bypass kmemcg charge at step 1,
but if step 1 succeeded and we successfully allocated a new slab page,
step 2 must be performed, otherwise we would get a per memcg kmem cache
which contains a slab that does not hold a reference to the memory
cgroup owning the cache. Since per memcg kmem caches are destroyed on
memcg css free, this could result in freeing a cache while there are
still active objects in it.
However, currently we will bypass slab page charge if the memory cgroup
owning the cache is offline (see __memcg_kmem_charge_memcg). This is
very unlikely to occur in practice, because for this to happen a process
must be migrated to a different cgroup and the old cgroup must be
removed while the process is in kmalloc somewhere between steps 1 and 2
(e.g. trying to allocate a new page). Nevertheless, it's still better
to eliminate such a possibility.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com>
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 8 +++-----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 3e4199830456..f36b20f5b3ed 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -2325,9 +2325,6 @@ int __memcg_kmem_charge_memcg(struct page *page, gfp_t gfp, int order,
struct page_counter *counter;
int ret;
- if (!memcg_kmem_online(memcg))
- return 0;
-
ret = try_charge(memcg, gfp, nr_pages);
if (ret)
return ret;
@@ -2346,10 +2343,11 @@ int __memcg_kmem_charge_memcg(struct page *page, gfp_t gfp, int order,
int __memcg_kmem_charge(struct page *page, gfp_t gfp, int order)
{
struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
- int ret;
+ int ret = 0;
memcg = get_mem_cgroup_from_mm(current->mm);
- ret = __memcg_kmem_charge_memcg(page, gfp, order, memcg);
+ if (memcg_kmem_online(memcg))
+ ret = __memcg_kmem_charge_memcg(page, gfp, order, memcg);
css_put(&memcg->css);
return ret;
}
--
2.1.4
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] mm: memcontrol: do not bypass slab charge if memcg is offline
2016-02-04 12:17 [PATCH] mm: memcontrol: do not bypass slab charge if memcg is offline Vladimir Davydov
@ 2016-02-04 20:33 ` Johannes Weiner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Johannes Weiner @ 2016-02-04 20:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vladimir Davydov; +Cc: Andrew Morton, Michal Hocko, linux-mm, linux-kernel
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 03:17:55PM +0300, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> Slab pages are charged in two steps. First, an appropriate per memcg
> cache is selected (see memcg_kmem_get_cache) basing on the current
> context, then the new slab page is charged to the memory cgroup which
> the selected cache was created for (see memcg_charge_slab ->
> __memcg_kmem_charge_memcg). It is OK to bypass kmemcg charge at step 1,
> but if step 1 succeeded and we successfully allocated a new slab page,
> step 2 must be performed, otherwise we would get a per memcg kmem cache
> which contains a slab that does not hold a reference to the memory
> cgroup owning the cache. Since per memcg kmem caches are destroyed on
> memcg css free, this could result in freeing a cache while there are
> still active objects in it.
>
> However, currently we will bypass slab page charge if the memory cgroup
> owning the cache is offline (see __memcg_kmem_charge_memcg). This is
> very unlikely to occur in practice, because for this to happen a process
> must be migrated to a different cgroup and the old cgroup must be
> removed while the process is in kmalloc somewhere between steps 1 and 2
> (e.g. trying to allocate a new page). Nevertheless, it's still better
> to eliminate such a possibility.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-02-04 20:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-02-04 12:17 [PATCH] mm: memcontrol: do not bypass slab charge if memcg is offline Vladimir Davydov
2016-02-04 20:33 ` Johannes Weiner
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).