From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/2] New MAP_PMEM_AWARE mmap flag
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 07:15:17 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160225201517.GA30721@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <x49twkwiozu.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 02:11:49PM -0500, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> writes:
>
> >> The big issue we have right now is that we haven't made the DAX/pmem
> >> infrastructure work correctly and reliably for general use. Hence
> >> adding new APIs to workaround cases where we haven't yet provided
> >> correct behaviour, let alone optimised for performance is, quite
> >> frankly, a clear case premature optimisation.
> >
> > Again, I see the two things as separate issues. You need both.
> > Implementing MAP_SYNC doesn't mean we don't have to solve the bigger
> > issue of making existing applications work safely.
>
> I want to add one more thing to this discussion, just for the sake of
> clarity. When I talk about existing applications and pmem, I mean
> applications that already know how to detect and recover from torn
> sectors. Any application that assumes hardware does not tear sectors
> should be run on a file system layered on top of the btt.
Which turns off DAX, and hence makes this a moot discussion because
mmap is then buffered through the page cache and hence applications
*must use msync/fsync* to provide data integrity. Which also makes
them safe to use with DAX if we have a working fsync.
Keep in mind that existing storage technologies tear fileystem data
writes, too, because user data writes are filesystem block sized and
not atomic at the device level (i.e. typical is 512 byte sector, 4k
filesystem block size, so there are 7 points in a single write where
a tear can occur on a crash).
IOWs existing storage already has the capability of tearing user
data on crash and has been doing so for a least they last 30 years.
Hence I really don't see any fundamental difference here with
pmem+DAX - the only difference is that the tear granuarlity is
smaller (CPU cacheline rather than sector).
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-25 20:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-21 17:03 [RFC 0/2] New MAP_PMEM_AWARE mmap flag Boaz Harrosh
2016-02-21 17:04 ` [RFC 1/2] mmap: Define a new " Boaz Harrosh
2016-02-21 17:06 ` [RFC 2/2] dax: Support " Boaz Harrosh
2016-02-21 19:51 ` [RFC 0/2] New " Dan Williams
2016-02-21 20:24 ` Boaz Harrosh
2016-02-21 20:57 ` Dan Williams
2016-02-21 21:23 ` Boaz Harrosh
2016-02-21 22:03 ` Dan Williams
2016-02-21 22:31 ` Dave Chinner
2016-02-22 9:57 ` Boaz Harrosh
2016-02-22 15:34 ` Jeff Moyer
2016-02-22 17:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-02-22 17:58 ` Jeff Moyer
2016-02-22 18:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-02-22 18:52 ` Jeff Moyer
2016-02-23 9:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-02-22 20:05 ` Rudoff, Andy
2016-02-23 9:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-02-23 10:07 ` Rudoff, Andy
2016-02-23 12:06 ` Dave Chinner
2016-02-23 17:10 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-23 21:47 ` Dave Chinner
2016-02-23 22:15 ` Boaz Harrosh
2016-02-23 23:28 ` Dave Chinner
2016-02-24 0:08 ` Boaz Harrosh
2016-02-23 14:10 ` Boaz Harrosh
2016-02-23 16:56 ` Dan Williams
2016-02-23 17:05 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-23 17:26 ` Dan Williams
2016-02-23 21:55 ` Boaz Harrosh
2016-02-23 22:33 ` Dan Williams
2016-02-23 23:07 ` Boaz Harrosh
2016-02-23 23:23 ` Dan Williams
2016-02-23 23:40 ` Boaz Harrosh
2016-02-24 0:08 ` Dave Chinner
2016-02-23 23:28 ` Jeff Moyer
2016-02-23 23:34 ` Dan Williams
2016-02-23 23:43 ` Jeff Moyer
2016-02-23 23:56 ` Dan Williams
2016-02-24 4:09 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-24 19:30 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-25 9:46 ` Jan Kara
2016-02-25 7:44 ` Boaz Harrosh
2016-02-24 15:02 ` Jeff Moyer
2016-02-24 22:56 ` Dave Chinner
2016-02-25 16:24 ` Jeff Moyer
2016-02-25 19:11 ` Jeff Moyer
2016-02-25 20:15 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2016-02-25 20:57 ` Jeff Moyer
2016-02-25 22:27 ` Dave Chinner
2016-02-26 4:02 ` Dan Williams
2016-02-26 10:04 ` Thanumalayan Sankaranarayana Pillai
2016-02-28 10:17 ` Boaz Harrosh
2016-03-03 17:38 ` Howard Chu
2016-02-29 20:25 ` Jeff Moyer
2016-02-25 21:08 ` Phil Terry
2016-02-25 21:39 ` Dave Chinner
2016-02-25 21:20 ` Dave Chinner
2016-02-29 20:32 ` Jeff Moyer
2016-02-23 17:25 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-23 22:47 ` Boaz Harrosh
2016-02-22 21:50 ` Dave Chinner
2016-02-23 13:51 ` Boaz Harrosh
2016-02-23 14:22 ` Jeff Moyer
2016-02-22 11:05 ` Boaz Harrosh
2016-03-11 6:44 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-03-11 19:07 ` Dan Williams
2016-03-11 19:10 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-03-11 23:02 ` Rudoff, Andy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160225201517.GA30721@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).