From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm: thp: Redefine default THP defrag behaviour disable it by default
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 20:46:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160226204628.GC2854@techsingularity.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160226195015.GK1180@redhat.com>
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 08:50:15PM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> Hello Mel,
>
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 11:13:16AM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > 1. By default, "madvise" and direct reclaim/compaction for applications
> > that specifically requested that behaviour. This will avoid breaking
> > MADV_HUGEPAGE which you mentioned in a few places
>
> Defragging memory synchronously only under madvise is fine with me.
>
I think this is a sensible default though. As you pointed out, those
applications specifically requested it and a delay *should* be acceptable. If
not, then it's a one-liner to change the behaviour.
> > 2. "never" will never reclaim anything and was the default behaviour of
> > version 1 but will not be the default in version 2.
> > 3. "defer" will wake kswapd which will reclaim or wake kcompactd
> > whichever is necessary. This is new but avoids stalls while helping
> > khugepaged do its work quickly in the near future.
>
> This is an kABI visible change, but it should be ok. I'm not aware of
> any program that parses that file and could get confused.
>
Neither am I but it'll be a wait and see approach unfortunately to see do
I get the dreaded "you broke an ABI that applications depend upon" report.
> "defer" sounds an interesting default option if it could be made to
> work better.
>
I was tempted to set it but given that there was a host of reclaim-related
bugs recently I backed off. For example, the last three releases has a
serious bug whereby NUMA machines swapped heavily and no one reported it
(or I missed it). There is still one excessive reclaiming bug open that
has a potential patch that hasn't been tested so that's still an issue. I
didn't want to muddy the waters further.
> > 4. "always" will direct reclaim/compact just like todays behaviour
>
> I suspect there are a number of apps that took advantage of the
> "always" setting without realizing it, but we only could notice the
> ones that don't.
Agreed but in itself, it'll be interesting to see if anyone notices. With
the new default, applications still get huge pages in a lot of cases. It'll
be interesting to report if someone complains about long-term behaviour where
THP utilisation is lower for periods of time until khugepaged recovers it.
> In any case those apps can start to call
> MADV_HUGEPAGE if they don't already and that will provide a definitive
> fix.
Yes or else they set the tunable to always and carry on.
> With this approach MADV_HUGEPAGE will provide the same
> reliability in allocation as before so there will be no problem then.
>
Yes.
As I believe your concerns have been addressed, can I get an ack on
this patch?
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-26 20:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-25 17:12 [PATCH 1/1] mm: thp: Redefine default THP defrag behaviour disable it by default Mel Gorman
2016-02-25 18:32 ` Rik van Riel
2016-02-25 19:07 ` Mel Gorman
2016-02-25 19:01 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2016-02-25 19:56 ` Mel Gorman
2016-02-25 23:02 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2016-02-25 23:08 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2016-02-26 11:13 ` Mel Gorman
2016-02-26 19:50 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2016-02-26 20:46 ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2016-02-26 10:32 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2016-03-02 18:47 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2016-02-25 19:45 ` Johannes Weiner
2016-02-26 10:52 ` Mel Gorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160226204628.GC2854@techsingularity.net \
--to=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).