From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf0-f173.google.com (mail-pf0-f173.google.com [209.85.192.173]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E32BF830AE for ; Sun, 20 Mar 2016 15:07:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pf0-f173.google.com with SMTP id n5so237889834pfn.2 for ; Sun, 20 Mar 2016 12:07:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com. [192.55.52.120]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id be6si13514511pad.69.2016.03.20.12.07.22 for ; Sun, 20 Mar 2016 12:07:22 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2016 22:07:14 +0300 From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/71] arc: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros Message-ID: <20160320190714.GA1907@black.fi.intel.com> References: <1458499278-1516-1-git-send-email-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> <1458499278-1516-2-git-send-email-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Christoph Lameter , Al Viro , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Andrew Morton , linux-fsdevel , Matthew Wilcox , Vineet Gupta , linux-mm On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 11:54:56AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > I'm OK with this, but let's not do this as a hundred small patches, OK? > > It doesn't help legibility or testing, so let's just do it in one big go. Okay, here's folded version of the patchset.