From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>
Cc: Josh Cartwright <joshc@ni.com>,
punnaiah choudary kalluri <punnaia@xilinx.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Sergey Dyasly <dserrg@gmail.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd.bergmann@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: Issue with ioremap
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 00:08:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160331230845.GN19428@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56FDAA66.2000505@redhat.com>
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 03:53:26PM -0700, Laura Abbott wrote:
> (cc linux-arm)
>
> On 03/31/2016 01:01 PM, Josh Cartwright wrote:
> >The driver _currently_ expects the virtual address to be 16M aligned,
> >but is that a hard requirement? It seems possible that the driver could
> >be written without this assumption, correct?
> >
> >This would mean that the driver would need to maintain the cs/cycles
> >configuration state outside of the mapped virtual address, and then
> >calculate + add the calculated offset to the base. Would that work?
> >I had been meaning to give it a try, but haven't gotten around to it.
>
> I was curious so I took a look and this seems to be caused by
The driver is most likely buggy in the way Josh has identified. The
peripheral device has no clue what virtual address is used to access
it, all it sees is the address on the bus.
--
RMK's Patch system: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-31 23:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-31 19:43 Issue with ioremap punnaiah choudary kalluri
2016-03-31 20:01 ` Josh Cartwright
2016-03-31 22:53 ` Laura Abbott
2016-03-31 23:08 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160331230845.GN19428@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=arnd.bergmann@linaro.org \
--cc=dserrg@gmail.com \
--cc=joshc@ni.com \
--cc=labbott@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=punnaia@xilinx.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).