From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
To: Rui Salvaterra <rsalvaterra@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com, sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, eunb.song@samsung.com,
minchan@kernel.org, chanho.min@lge.com, kyungsik.lee@lge.com,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] lib: lz4: fixed zram with lz4 on big endian machines
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2016 11:41:58 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160410024158.GB695@swordfish> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1460235935-1003-2-git-send-email-rsalvaterra@gmail.com>
On (04/09/16 22:05), Rui Salvaterra wrote:
> Note that the 64-bit preprocessor test is not a cleanup, it's part of
> the fix, since those identifiers are bogus (for example, __ppc64__
> isn't defined anywhere else in the kernel, which means we'd fall into
> the 32-bit definitions on ppc64).
good find.
> Tested on ppc64 with no regression on x86_64.
>
> [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=145994470805853&w=4
>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Suggested-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rui Salvaterra <rsalvaterra@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
-ss
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-10 1:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-09 21:05 [PATCH v2 0/2] lib: lz4: fix for big endian and cleanup Rui Salvaterra
2016-04-09 21:05 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] lib: lz4: fixed zram with lz4 on big endian machines Rui Salvaterra
2016-04-10 2:41 ` Sergey Senozhatsky [this message]
2016-04-09 21:05 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] lib: lz4: cleanup unaligned access efficiency detection Rui Salvaterra
2016-04-10 2:40 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160410024158.GB695@swordfish \
--to=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
--cc=chanho.min@lge.com \
--cc=eunb.song@samsung.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kyungsik.lee@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=rsalvaterra@gmail.com \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).