From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pa0-f70.google.com (mail-pa0-f70.google.com [209.85.220.70]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1D7B6B0005 for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 20:57:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pa0-f70.google.com with SMTP id dx6so296166208pad.0 for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 17:57:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-pa0-x22e.google.com (mail-pa0-x22e.google.com. [2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22e]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n3si1086027pfb.123.2016.04.25.17.57.48 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 25 Apr 2016 17:57:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pa0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id iv1so21885285pac.2 for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 17:57:48 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 09:59:19 +0900 From: Sergey Senozhatsky Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/zpool: use workqueue for zpool_destroy Message-ID: <20160426005919.GA9699@swordfish> References: <1461619210-10057-1-git-send-email-ddstreet@ieee.org> <20160425221816.GA1254@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160425221816.GA1254@google.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Yu Zhao Cc: Dan Streetman , Andrew Morton , Seth Jennings , Sergey Senozhatsky , Minchan Kim , Nitin Gupta , Linux-MM , Sergey Senozhatsky , linux-kernel , Dan Streetman On (04/25/16 15:18), Yu Zhao wrote: > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 05:20:10PM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote: > > Add a work_struct to struct zpool, and change zpool_destroy_pool to > > defer calling the pool implementation destroy. > > > > The zsmalloc pool destroy function, which is one of the zpool > > implementations, may sleep during destruction of the pool. However > > zswap, which uses zpool, may call zpool_destroy_pool from atomic > > context. So we need to defer the call to the zpool implementation > > to destroy the pool. > > > > This is essentially the same as Yu Zhao's proposed patch to zsmalloc, > > but moved to zpool. > > Thanks, Dan. Sergey also mentioned another call path that triggers the > same problem (BUG: scheduling while atomic): > rcu_process_callbacks() > __zswap_pool_release() > zswap_pool_destroy() > zswap_cpu_comp_destroy() > cpu_notifier_register_begin() > mutex_lock(&cpu_add_remove_lock); > So I was thinking zswap_pool_destroy() might be done in workqueue in zswap.c. > This way we fix both call paths. right, I'm not sure the patch addressed all of the issues. -ss -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org