From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] vfio device assignment regression with THP ref counting redesign
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 18:34:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160429163444.GM11700@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160429070611.GA4990@node.shutemov.name>
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 10:06:11AM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> Hm. I just woke up and haven't got any coffee yet, but I don't why my
> approach would be worse for performance. Both have the same algorithmic
> complexity.
Even before looking at the overall performance, I'm not sure your
patch is really fixing it all: you didn't touch reuse_swap_page which
is used by do_wp_page to know if it can call do_wp_page_reuse. Your
patch would still trigger a COW instead of calling do_wp_page_reuse,
but it would only happen if the page was pinned after the pmd split,
which is probably not what the testcase is triggering. My patch
instead fixed that too.
total_mapcount returns the wrong value for reuse_swap_page, which is
probably why you didn't try to use it there.
The main issue of my patch is that it has a performance downside that
is page_mapcount becomes expensive for all other usages, which is
better than breaking vfio but I couldn't use total_mapcount again
because it counts things wrong in reuse_swap_page.
Like I said there's room for optimizations so today I tried to
optimize more stuff...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-29 16:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-28 16:20 [BUG] vfio device assignment regression with THP ref counting redesign Alex Williamson
2016-04-28 18:17 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2016-04-28 18:58 ` Alex Williamson
2016-04-28 23:21 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2016-04-29 0:44 ` Alex Williamson
2016-04-29 0:51 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2016-04-29 2:45 ` Alex Williamson
2016-04-29 7:06 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2016-04-29 15:12 ` Alex Williamson
2016-04-29 16:34 ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2016-04-29 22:34 ` Alex Williamson
2016-05-02 10:41 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2016-05-02 11:15 ` Jerome Glisse
2016-05-02 12:14 ` GUP guarantees wrt to userspace mappings redesign Kirill A. Shutemov
2016-05-02 13:39 ` Jerome Glisse
2016-05-02 15:00 ` GUP guarantees wrt to userspace mappings Kirill A. Shutemov
2016-05-02 15:22 ` Jerome Glisse
2016-05-02 16:12 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2016-05-02 19:14 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2016-05-02 19:11 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2016-05-02 19:02 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2016-05-02 14:15 ` GUP guarantees wrt to userspace mappings redesign Oleg Nesterov
2016-05-02 16:21 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2016-05-02 16:22 ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-05-02 18:03 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2016-05-02 17:41 ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-05-02 18:56 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2016-05-02 15:23 ` [BUG] vfio device assignment regression with THP ref counting redesign Andrea Arcangeli
2016-05-02 16:00 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2016-05-02 18:03 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2016-05-05 1:19 ` Alex Williamson
2016-05-05 14:39 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2016-05-05 15:09 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2016-05-05 15:11 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2016-05-05 15:24 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2016-05-06 7:29 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160429163444.GM11700@redhat.com \
--to=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).