From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] zram: introduce per-device debug_stat sysfs node
Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 15:23:03 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160513062303.GA21204@bbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160513010929.GA615@swordfish>
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 10:09:29AM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> Hello Minchan,
>
> On (05/13/16 08:41), Minchan Kim wrote:
> [..]
>
> will fix and update, thanks!
>
>
> > > @@ -719,6 +737,8 @@ compress_again:
> > > zcomp_strm_release(zram->comp, zstrm);
> > > zstrm = NULL;
> > >
> > > + atomic64_inc(&zram->stats.num_recompress);
> > > +
> >
> > It should be below "goto compress_again".
>
> I moved it out of goto intentionally. this second zs_malloc()
>
> handle = zs_malloc(meta->mem_pool, clen,
> GFP_NOIO | __GFP_HIGHMEM |
> __GFP_MOVABLE);
>
> can take some time to complete, which will slow down zram for a bit,
> and _theoretically_ this second zs_malloc() still can fail. yes, we
> would do the error print out pr_err("Error allocating memory ... ")
> and inc the `failed_writes' in zram_bvec_rw(), but zram_bvec_write()
> has several more error return paths that can inc the `failed_writes'.
> so by just looking at the stats we won't be able to tell that we had
> failed fast path allocation combined with failed slow path allocation
> (IOW, `goto recompress' never happened).
>
> so I'm thinking about changing its name to num_failed_fast_compress
> or num_failed_fast_write, or something similar and thus count the number
> of times we fell to "!handle" branch, not the number of goto-s.
> what do you think? or do you want it to be num_recompress specifically?
Sorry, I don't get your point.
What's the problem with below?
goto compress_again
so
atomic_inc(num_recompress)
My concern isn't a performance or something but just want to be more
readable and not error-prone which can increase num_compress although
second zs_malloc could be failed. When I tested with heavy workload,
I saw second zs_malloc can be fail but not frequently so it's not
theoretical issue.
What's the your concern with below?
Sorry if I don't get your point. Please elaborate it more.
diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
index a629bd8d452b..8bdcc4b2b9b8 100644
--- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
@@ -737,12 +737,12 @@ static int zram_bvec_write(struct zram *zram, struct bio_vec *bvec, u32 index,
zcomp_strm_release(zram->comp, zstrm);
zstrm = NULL;
- atomic64_inc(&zram->stats.num_recompress);
-
handle = zs_malloc(meta->mem_pool, clen,
GFP_NOIO | __GFP_HIGHMEM);
- if (handle)
+ if (handle) {
+ atomic64_inc(&zram->stats.num_recompress);
goto compress_again;
+ }
pr_err("Error allocating memory for compressed page: %u, size=%zu\n",
index, clen);
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-13 6:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-11 13:45 [PATCH] zram: introduce per-device debug_stat sysfs node Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-05-12 23:41 ` Minchan Kim
2016-05-13 1:09 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-05-13 6:23 ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2016-05-13 6:58 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-05-13 7:05 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-05-13 7:20 ` Minchan Kim
2016-05-13 7:41 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-05-13 8:06 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-05-13 23:05 ` Minchan Kim
2016-05-14 3:37 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160513062303.GA21204@bbox \
--to=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).