From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pa0-f69.google.com (mail-pa0-f69.google.com [209.85.220.69]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 220056B0005 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 08:58:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pa0-f69.google.com with SMTP id ao6so26346563pac.2 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 05:58:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org. [2001:1868:205::9]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f5si16564693pay.145.2016.06.21.05.58.27 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 21 Jun 2016 05:58:27 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 05:58:07 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] Add the latent_entropy gcc plugin Message-ID: <20160621125807.GA19065@infradead.org> References: <20160620203910.a8b6b5b10d18f24661916e7b@gmail.com> <20160620204119.6299c961570a7a9ad6cbdd51@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160620204119.6299c961570a7a9ad6cbdd51@gmail.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Emese Revfy Cc: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com, pageexec@freemail.hu, spender@grsecurity.net, mmarek@suse.com, keescook@chromium.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yamada.masahiro@socionext.com, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, axboe@kernel.dk, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mingo@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, bart.vanassche@sandisk.com, davem@davemloft.net On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 08:41:19PM +0200, Emese Revfy wrote: > --- /dev/null > +++ b/scripts/gcc-plugins/latent_entropy_plugin.c > @@ -0,0 +1,639 @@ > +/* > + * Copyright 2012-2016 by the PaX Team > + * Copyright 2016 by Emese Revfy > + * Licensed under the GPL v2 > + * > + * Note: the choice of the license means that the compilation process is > + * NOT 'eligible' as defined by gcc's library exception to the GPL v3, > + * but for the kernel it doesn't matter since it doesn't link against > + * any of the gcc libraries I remember we used to have architectures that actually linked against libgcc. Isn't that the case anymore? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org