From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
rientjes@google.com, vdavydov@parallels.com, mst@redhat.com,
mhocko@suse.com, mhocko@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] mm,oom_reaper: Remove pointless kthread_run() failure check.
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2016 13:13:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160704111353.GA3964@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201607040653.DJB81254.FFOOSHFOQMtJLV@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
I guess we misunderstood each other,
On 07/04, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
>
> Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > On 07/04, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> > >
> > > Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > > > On 07/03, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > If kthread_run() in oom_init() fails due to reasons other than OOM
> > > > > (e.g. no free pid is available), userspace processes won't be able to
> > > > > start as well.
> > > >
> > > > Why?
> > > >
> > > > The kernel will boot with or without your change, but
and yes, I probably confused you. I tried to say that in theory nothing
prevents the kernel from booting even if oom_init() fails.
> > IOW, this patch doesn't look correct without other changes?
>
> If you think that global init can successfully start after kthread_run()
> in oom_init() failed.
No, I think you are right. If kthread_run() fails at this stage than something
is seriously wrong anyway. And yes, for example hung_task_init() doesn't bother
to check the value returned by kthread_run().
I meant that this just looks wrong (and proc_dohung_task_timeout_secs() too).
And the warning can help to identify the problem.
In any case I agree, we should remove "oom_reaper_th",
> static int __init oom_init(void)
> {
> - oom_reaper_th = kthread_run(oom_reaper, NULL, "oom_reaper");
> - if (IS_ERR(oom_reaper_th)) {
> - pr_err("Unable to start OOM reaper %ld. Continuing regardless\n",
> - PTR_ERR(oom_reaper_th));
> - oom_reaper_th = NULL;
> - }
> + struct task_struct *p = kthread_run(oom_reaper, NULL, "oom_reaper");
> +
> + BUG_ON(IS_ERR(p));
> return 0;
Yes, do_initcall_level() ignores the error returned by fn(), so we need BUG()
or panic().
This is off-topic, but perhaps we should audit all initcalls and fix those
who return the error for no reason, say, bts_init(). And then change
do_one_initcall() to panic or at least WARN() if a non-modular initcall fails.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-04 11:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-03 2:35 [PATCH 0/8] Change OOM killer to use list of mm_struct Tetsuo Handa
2016-07-03 2:36 ` [PATCH 1/8] mm,oom_reaper: Remove pointless kthread_run() failure check Tetsuo Handa
2016-07-03 12:42 ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-07-03 16:03 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-07-03 17:10 ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-07-03 21:53 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-07-04 11:13 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2016-07-07 11:14 ` Michal Hocko
2016-07-03 2:37 ` [PATCH 2/8] mm,oom_reaper: Reduce find_lock_task_mm() usage Tetsuo Handa
2016-07-07 11:19 ` Michal Hocko
2016-07-03 2:38 ` [PATCH 3/8] mm,oom: Use list of mm_struct used by OOM victims Tetsuo Handa
2016-07-04 10:39 ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-07-04 12:50 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-07-04 18:25 ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-07-05 10:43 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-07-05 20:52 ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-07-06 8:53 ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-07-06 11:43 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-07-07 11:31 ` Michal Hocko
2016-07-03 2:39 ` [PATCH 4/8] mm,oom: Remove OOM_SCAN_ABORT case Tetsuo Handa
2016-07-03 2:40 ` [PATCH 5/8] mm,oom: Remove unused signal_struct->oom_victims Tetsuo Handa
2016-07-07 14:03 ` Michal Hocko
2016-07-03 2:40 ` [PATCH 6/8] mm,oom_reaper: Stop clearing TIF_MEMDIE on remote thread Tetsuo Handa
2016-07-07 14:06 ` Michal Hocko
2016-07-07 16:10 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-07-07 16:54 ` Michal Hocko
2016-07-03 2:41 ` [PATCH 7/8] mm,oom_reaper: Pass OOM victim's comm and pid values via mm_struct Tetsuo Handa
2016-07-03 2:41 ` [PATCH 8/8] mm,oom_reaper: Make OOM reaper use list of mm_struct Tetsuo Handa
2016-07-04 10:40 ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-07-07 14:15 ` Michal Hocko
2016-07-07 11:04 ` [PATCH 0/8] Change OOM killer to " Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160704111353.GA3964@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=vdavydov@parallels.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).