From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 31/31] mm, vmstat: Remove zone and node double accounting by approximating retries
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 09:58:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160706085850.GN11498@techsingularity.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160706000252.GA12570@bbox>
On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 09:02:52AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 09:01:39PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > The number of LRU pages, dirty pages and writeback pages must be accounted
> > for on both zones and nodes because of the reclaim retry logic, compaction
> > retry logic and highmem calculations all depending on per-zone stats.
> >
> > The retry logic is only critical for allocations that can use any zones.
>
> Sorry, I cannot follow this assertion.
> Could you explain?
>
The patch has been reworked since and I tried clarifying the changelog.
Does this help?
--- 8<----
mm, vmstat: remove zone and node double accounting by approximating retries
The number of LRU pages, dirty pages and writeback pages must be accounted
for on both zones and nodes because of the reclaim retry logic, compaction
retry logic and highmem calculations all depending on per-zone stats.
Many lowmem allocations are immune from OOM kill due to a check in
__alloc_pages_may_oom for (ac->high_zoneidx < ZONE_NORMAL) since commit
03668b3ceb0c ("oom: avoid oom killer for lowmem allocations"). The exception
is costly high-order allocations or allocations that cannot fail. If the
__alloc_pages_may_oom avoids OOM-kill for low-order lowmem allocations
then a check in __alloc_pages_slowpath will always retry.
Hence this patch will always retry reclaim for zone-constrained allocations
in should_reclaim_retry.
As there is no guarantee enough memory can ever be freed to satisfy
compaction, this patch avoids retrying compaction for zone-contrained
allocations.o
In combination, that means that the per-node stats can be used when deciding
whether to continue reclaim using a rough approximation. While it is
possible this will make the wrong decision on occasion, it will not infinite
loop as the number of reclaim attempts is capped by MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES.
The final step is calculating the number of dirtyable highmem pages. As
those calculations only care about the global count of file pages in
highmem. This patch uses a global counter used instead of per-zone stats
as it is sufficient.
In combination, this allows the per-zone LRU and dirty state counters to
be removed.
Suggested by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com>
diff --git a/include/linux/mm_inline.h b/include/linux/mm_inline.h
index 9aadcc781857..c68680aac044 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm_inline.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm_inline.h
@@ -4,6 +4,22 @@
#include <linux/huge_mm.h>
#include <linux/swap.h>
+#ifdef CONFIG_HIGHMEM
+extern unsigned long highmem_file_pages;
+
+static inline void acct_highmem_file_pages(int zid, enum lru_list lru,
+ int nr_pages)
+{
+ if (is_highmem_idx(zid) && is_file_lru(lru))
+ highmem_file_pages += nr_pages;
+}
+#else
+static inline void acct_highmem_file_pages(int zid, enum lru_list lru,
+ int nr_pages)
+{
+}
+#endif
+
/**
* page_is_file_cache - should the page be on a file LRU or anon LRU?
* @page: the page to test
@@ -29,9 +45,7 @@ static __always_inline void __update_lru_size(struct lruvec *lruvec,
struct pglist_data *pgdat = lruvec_pgdat(lruvec);
__mod_node_page_state(pgdat, NR_LRU_BASE + lru, nr_pages);
- __mod_zone_page_state(&pgdat->node_zones[zid],
- NR_ZONE_LRU_BASE + !!is_file_lru(lru),
- nr_pages);
+ acct_highmem_file_pages(zid, lru, nr_pages);
}
static __always_inline void update_lru_size(struct lruvec *lruvec,
diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
index bd33e6f1bed0..a3b7f45aac56 100644
--- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
+++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
@@ -110,10 +110,6 @@ struct zone_padding {
enum zone_stat_item {
/* First 128 byte cacheline (assuming 64 bit words) */
NR_FREE_PAGES,
- NR_ZONE_LRU_BASE, /* Used only for compaction and reclaim retry */
- NR_ZONE_LRU_ANON = NR_ZONE_LRU_BASE,
- NR_ZONE_LRU_FILE,
- NR_ZONE_WRITE_PENDING, /* Count of dirty, writeback and unstable pages */
NR_MLOCK, /* mlock()ed pages found and moved off LRU */
NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE,
NR_SLAB_UNRECLAIMABLE,
diff --git a/include/linux/swap.h b/include/linux/swap.h
index b17cc4830fa6..cc753c639e3d 100644
--- a/include/linux/swap.h
+++ b/include/linux/swap.h
@@ -307,7 +307,6 @@ extern void lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(struct page *page,
struct vm_area_struct *vma);
/* linux/mm/vmscan.c */
-extern unsigned long zone_reclaimable_pages(struct zone *zone);
extern unsigned long pgdat_reclaimable_pages(struct pglist_data *pgdat);
extern unsigned long try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist, int order,
gfp_t gfp_mask, nodemask_t *mask);
diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
index a0bd85712516..dfe7dafe8e8b 100644
--- a/mm/compaction.c
+++ b/mm/compaction.c
@@ -1446,6 +1446,13 @@ bool compaction_zonelist_suitable(struct alloc_context *ac, int order,
{
struct zone *zone;
struct zoneref *z;
+ pg_data_t *last_pgdat = NULL;
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_HIGHMEM
+ /* Do not retry compaction for zone-constrained allocations */
+ if (!is_highmem_idx(ac->high_zoneidx))
+ return false;
+#endif
/*
* Make sure at least one zone would pass __compaction_suitable if we continue
@@ -1456,14 +1463,27 @@ bool compaction_zonelist_suitable(struct alloc_context *ac, int order,
unsigned long available;
enum compact_result compact_result;
+ if (last_pgdat == zone->zone_pgdat)
+ continue;
+
+ /*
+ * This over-estimates the number of pages available for
+ * reclaim/compaction but walking the LRU would take too
+ * long. The consequences are that compaction may retry
+ * longer than it should for a zone-constrained allocation
+ * request.
+ */
+ last_pgdat = zone->zone_pgdat;
+ available = pgdat_reclaimable_pages(zone->zone_pgdat) / order;
+
/*
* Do not consider all the reclaimable memory because we do not
* want to trash just for a single high order allocation which
* is even not guaranteed to appear even if __compaction_suitable
* is happy about the watermark check.
*/
- available = zone_reclaimable_pages(zone) / order;
available += zone_page_state_snapshot(zone, NR_FREE_PAGES);
+ available = min(zone->managed_pages, available);
compact_result = __compaction_suitable(zone, order, alloc_flags,
ac_classzone_idx(ac), available);
if (compact_result != COMPACT_SKIPPED &&
diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
index c77997dc6ed7..ed2f85e61de1 100644
--- a/mm/migrate.c
+++ b/mm/migrate.c
@@ -513,9 +513,7 @@ int migrate_page_move_mapping(struct address_space *mapping,
}
if (dirty && mapping_cap_account_dirty(mapping)) {
__dec_node_state(oldzone->zone_pgdat, NR_FILE_DIRTY);
- __dec_zone_state(oldzone, NR_ZONE_WRITE_PENDING);
__inc_node_state(newzone->zone_pgdat, NR_FILE_DIRTY);
- __dec_zone_state(newzone, NR_ZONE_WRITE_PENDING);
}
}
local_irq_enable();
diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
index 3c02aa603f5a..8db1db234915 100644
--- a/mm/page-writeback.c
+++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
@@ -299,6 +299,9 @@ static unsigned long node_dirtyable_memory(struct pglist_data *pgdat)
return nr_pages;
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_HIGHMEM
+unsigned long highmem_file_pages;
+#endif
static unsigned long highmem_dirtyable_memory(unsigned long total)
{
@@ -306,18 +309,17 @@ static unsigned long highmem_dirtyable_memory(unsigned long total)
int node;
unsigned long x = 0;
int i;
+ unsigned long dirtyable = highmem_file_pages;
for_each_node_state(node, N_HIGH_MEMORY) {
for (i = ZONE_NORMAL + 1; i < MAX_NR_ZONES; i++) {
struct zone *z;
- unsigned long dirtyable;
if (!is_highmem_idx(i))
continue;
z = &NODE_DATA(node)->node_zones[i];
- dirtyable = zone_page_state(z, NR_FREE_PAGES) +
- zone_page_state(z, NR_ZONE_LRU_FILE);
+ dirtyable += zone_page_state(z, NR_FREE_PAGES);
/* watch for underflows */
dirtyable -= min(dirtyable, high_wmark_pages(z));
@@ -2460,7 +2462,6 @@ void account_page_dirtied(struct page *page, struct address_space *mapping)
mem_cgroup_inc_page_stat(page, MEM_CGROUP_STAT_DIRTY);
__inc_node_page_state(page, NR_FILE_DIRTY);
- __inc_zone_page_state(page, NR_ZONE_WRITE_PENDING);
__inc_node_page_state(page, NR_DIRTIED);
__inc_wb_stat(wb, WB_RECLAIMABLE);
__inc_wb_stat(wb, WB_DIRTIED);
@@ -2482,7 +2483,6 @@ void account_page_cleaned(struct page *page, struct address_space *mapping,
if (mapping_cap_account_dirty(mapping)) {
mem_cgroup_dec_page_stat(page, MEM_CGROUP_STAT_DIRTY);
dec_node_page_state(page, NR_FILE_DIRTY);
- dec_zone_page_state(page, NR_ZONE_WRITE_PENDING);
dec_wb_stat(wb, WB_RECLAIMABLE);
task_io_account_cancelled_write(PAGE_SIZE);
}
@@ -2739,7 +2739,6 @@ int clear_page_dirty_for_io(struct page *page)
if (TestClearPageDirty(page)) {
mem_cgroup_dec_page_stat(page, MEM_CGROUP_STAT_DIRTY);
dec_node_page_state(page, NR_FILE_DIRTY);
- dec_zone_page_state(page, NR_ZONE_WRITE_PENDING);
dec_wb_stat(wb, WB_RECLAIMABLE);
ret = 1;
}
@@ -2786,7 +2785,6 @@ int test_clear_page_writeback(struct page *page)
if (ret) {
mem_cgroup_dec_page_stat(page, MEM_CGROUP_STAT_WRITEBACK);
dec_node_page_state(page, NR_WRITEBACK);
- dec_zone_page_state(page, NR_ZONE_WRITE_PENDING);
inc_node_page_state(page, NR_WRITTEN);
}
unlock_page_memcg(page);
@@ -2841,7 +2839,6 @@ int __test_set_page_writeback(struct page *page, bool keep_write)
if (!ret) {
mem_cgroup_inc_page_stat(page, MEM_CGROUP_STAT_WRITEBACK);
inc_node_page_state(page, NR_WRITEBACK);
- inc_zone_page_state(page, NR_ZONE_WRITE_PENDING);
}
unlock_page_memcg(page);
return ret;
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 030114f55b0e..ded48e580abc 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -3445,6 +3445,7 @@ should_reclaim_retry(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned order,
{
struct zone *zone;
struct zoneref *z;
+ pg_data_t *current_pgdat = NULL;
/*
* Make sure we converge to OOM if we cannot make any progress
@@ -3454,6 +3455,14 @@ should_reclaim_retry(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned order,
return false;
/*
+ * Blindly retry allocation requests that cannot use all zones. We do
+ * not have a reliable and fast means of calculating reclaimable, dirty
+ * and writeback pages in eligible zones.
+ */
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HIGHMEM) && !is_highmem_idx(gfp_zone(gfp_mask)))
+ goto out;
+
+ /*
* Keep reclaiming pages while there is a chance this will lead somewhere.
* If none of the target zones can satisfy our allocation request even
* if all reclaimable pages are considered then we are screwed and have
@@ -3463,18 +3472,38 @@ should_reclaim_retry(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned order,
ac->nodemask) {
unsigned long available;
unsigned long reclaimable;
+ int zid;
- available = reclaimable = zone_reclaimable_pages(zone);
+ if (current_pgdat == zone->zone_pgdat)
+ continue;
+
+ current_pgdat = zone->zone_pgdat;
+ available = reclaimable = pgdat_reclaimable_pages(current_pgdat);
available -= DIV_ROUND_UP(no_progress_loops * available,
MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES);
- available += zone_page_state_snapshot(zone, NR_FREE_PAGES);
+
+ /* Account for all free pages on eligible zones */
+ for (zid = 0; zid <= zone_idx(zone); zid++) {
+ struct zone *acct_zone = ¤t_pgdat->node_zones[zid];
+
+ available += zone_page_state_snapshot(acct_zone, NR_FREE_PAGES);
+ }
/*
* Would the allocation succeed if we reclaimed the whole
- * available?
+ * available? This is approximate because there is no
+ * accurate count of reclaimable pages per zone.
*/
- if (__zone_watermark_ok(zone, order, min_wmark_pages(zone),
- ac_classzone_idx(ac), alloc_flags, available)) {
+ for (zid = 0; zid <= zone_idx(zone); zid++) {
+ struct zone *check_zone = ¤t_pgdat->node_zones[zid];
+ unsigned long estimate;
+
+ estimate = min(check_zone->managed_pages, available);
+ if (!__zone_watermark_ok(check_zone, order,
+ min_wmark_pages(check_zone), ac_classzone_idx(ac),
+ alloc_flags, estimate))
+ continue;
+
/*
* If we didn't make any progress and have a lot of
* dirty + writeback pages then we should wait for
@@ -3484,15 +3513,16 @@ should_reclaim_retry(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned order,
if (!did_some_progress) {
unsigned long write_pending;
- write_pending = zone_page_state_snapshot(zone,
- NR_ZONE_WRITE_PENDING);
+ write_pending =
+ node_page_state(current_pgdat, NR_WRITEBACK) +
+ node_page_state(current_pgdat, NR_FILE_DIRTY);
if (2 * write_pending > reclaimable) {
congestion_wait(BLK_RW_ASYNC, HZ/10);
return true;
}
}
-
+out:
/*
* Memory allocation/reclaim might be called from a WQ
* context and the current implementation of the WQ
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 9eed2d3e05f3..a8ebd1871f16 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -194,22 +194,6 @@ static bool sane_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
}
#endif
-/*
- * This misses isolated pages which are not accounted for to save counters.
- * As the data only determines if reclaim or compaction continues, it is
- * not expected that isolated pages will be a dominating factor.
- */
-unsigned long zone_reclaimable_pages(struct zone *zone)
-{
- unsigned long nr;
-
- nr = zone_page_state_snapshot(zone, NR_ZONE_LRU_FILE);
- if (get_nr_swap_pages() > 0)
- nr += zone_page_state_snapshot(zone, NR_ZONE_LRU_ANON);
-
- return nr;
-}
-
unsigned long pgdat_reclaimable_pages(struct pglist_data *pgdat)
{
unsigned long nr;
@@ -3167,7 +3151,7 @@ static int balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order, int classzone_idx)
* zone was balanced even under extreme pressure when the
* overall node may be congested.
*/
- for (i = sc.reclaim_idx; i >= 0; i--) {
+ for (i = sc.reclaim_idx; i >= 0 && !buffer_heads_over_limit; i--) {
zone = pgdat->node_zones + i;
if (!populated_zone(zone))
continue;
diff --git a/mm/vmstat.c b/mm/vmstat.c
index 60372f31fee3..7415775faf08 100644
--- a/mm/vmstat.c
+++ b/mm/vmstat.c
@@ -921,9 +921,6 @@ int fragmentation_index(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order)
const char * const vmstat_text[] = {
/* enum zone_stat_item countes */
"nr_free_pages",
- "nr_zone_anon_lru",
- "nr_zone_file_lru",
- "nr_zone_write_pending",
"nr_mlock",
"nr_slab_reclaimable",
"nr_slab_unreclaimable",
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-06 8:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 92+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-01 20:01 [PATCH 00/31] Move LRU page reclaim from zones to nodes v8 Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01 ` [PATCH 01/31] mm, vmstat: add infrastructure for per-node vmstats Mel Gorman
2016-07-04 23:50 ` Minchan Kim
2016-07-05 8:14 ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-06 0:15 ` Minchan Kim
2016-07-01 20:01 ` [PATCH 02/31] mm, vmscan: move lru_lock to the node Mel Gorman
2016-07-05 0:03 ` Minchan Kim
2016-07-01 20:01 ` [PATCH 03/31] mm, vmscan: move LRU lists to node Mel Gorman
2016-07-05 1:19 ` Minchan Kim
2016-07-05 10:14 ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01 ` [PATCH 04/31] mm, vmscan: begin reclaiming pages on a per-node basis Mel Gorman
2016-07-07 1:12 ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-07-07 9:48 ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-08 2:28 ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-07-08 10:05 ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-14 6:28 ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-07-14 7:48 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-07-18 4:52 ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-07-18 12:11 ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-18 14:27 ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-19 8:30 ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-07-19 14:25 ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01 ` [PATCH 05/31] mm, vmscan: have kswapd only scan based on the highest requested zone Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01 ` [PATCH 06/31] mm, vmscan: make kswapd reclaim in terms of nodes Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01 ` [PATCH 07/31] mm, vmscan: remove balance gap Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01 ` [PATCH 08/31] mm, vmscan: simplify the logic deciding whether kswapd sleeps Mel Gorman
2016-07-05 5:59 ` Minchan Kim
2016-07-05 10:26 ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-06 0:30 ` Minchan Kim
2016-07-06 8:31 ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-07 5:51 ` Minchan Kim
2016-07-07 9:56 ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-07 1:20 ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-07-07 10:17 ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-08 2:44 ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-07-08 10:11 ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-14 5:23 ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-07-14 8:32 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-07-18 5:07 ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-07-18 6:51 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-07-18 7:24 ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-07-14 9:05 ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-18 5:03 ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-07-01 20:01 ` [PATCH 09/31] mm, vmscan: by default have direct reclaim only shrink once per node Mel Gorman
2016-07-07 1:43 ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-07-07 10:27 ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01 ` [PATCH 10/31] mm, vmscan: remove duplicate logic clearing node congestion and dirty state Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01 ` [PATCH 11/31] mm: vmscan: do not reclaim from kswapd if there is any eligible zone Mel Gorman
2016-07-05 6:11 ` Minchan Kim
2016-07-05 10:38 ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-06 1:25 ` Minchan Kim
2016-07-06 8:42 ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-07 6:27 ` Minchan Kim
2016-07-07 10:55 ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01 ` [PATCH 12/31] mm, vmscan: make shrink_node decisions more node-centric Mel Gorman
2016-07-05 6:24 ` Minchan Kim
2016-07-05 10:40 ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01 ` [PATCH 13/31] mm, memcg: move memcg limit enforcement from zones to nodes Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01 ` [PATCH 14/31] mm, workingset: make working set detection node-aware Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01 ` [PATCH 15/31] mm, page_alloc: consider dirtyable memory in terms of nodes Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01 ` [PATCH 16/31] mm: move page mapped accounting to the node Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01 ` [PATCH 17/31] mm: rename NR_ANON_PAGES to NR_ANON_MAPPED Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01 ` [PATCH 18/31] mm: move most file-based accounting to the node Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01 ` [PATCH 19/31] mm: move vmscan writes and file write " Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01 ` [PATCH 20/31] mm, vmscan: only wakeup kswapd once per node for the requested classzone Mel Gorman
2016-07-07 1:24 ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-07-07 10:58 ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01 ` [PATCH 21/31] mm, page_alloc: Wake kswapd based on the highest eligible zone Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01 ` [PATCH 22/31] mm: convert zone_reclaim to node_reclaim Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01 ` [PATCH 23/31] mm, vmscan: Avoid passing in classzone_idx unnecessarily to shrink_node Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01 ` [PATCH 24/31] mm, vmscan: Avoid passing in classzone_idx unnecessarily to compaction_ready Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01 ` [PATCH 25/31] mm, vmscan: add classzone information to tracepoints Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01 ` [PATCH 26/31] mm, page_alloc: remove fair zone allocation policy Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01 ` [PATCH 27/31] mm: page_alloc: cache the last node whose dirty limit is reached Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01 ` [PATCH 28/31] mm: vmstat: replace __count_zone_vm_events with a zone id equivalent Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01 ` [PATCH 29/31] mm: vmstat: account per-zone stalls and pages skipped during reclaim Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01 ` [PATCH 30/31] mm, vmstat: print node-based stats in zoneinfo file Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01 ` [PATCH 31/31] mm, vmstat: Remove zone and node double accounting by approximating retries Mel Gorman
2016-07-06 0:02 ` Minchan Kim
2016-07-06 8:58 ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2016-07-06 9:33 ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-07 6:47 ` Minchan Kim
2016-07-06 18:12 ` Dave Hansen
2016-07-07 11:26 ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-04 1:37 ` [PATCH 00/31] Move LRU page reclaim from zones to nodes v8 Minchan Kim
2016-07-04 4:34 ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-04 8:04 ` Minchan Kim
2016-07-04 9:55 ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-06 1:51 ` Minchan Kim
[not found] <00f601d1d691$d790ad40$86b207c0$@alibaba-inc.com>
2016-07-05 8:07 ` [PATCH 31/31] mm, vmstat: Remove zone and node double accounting by approximating retries Hillf Danton
2016-07-05 10:55 ` Mel Gorman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-07-01 15:37 [PATCH 00/31] Move LRU page reclaim from zones to nodes v8 Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 15:37 ` [PATCH 31/31] mm, vmstat: Remove zone and node double accounting by approximating retries Mel Gorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160706085850.GN11498@techsingularity.net \
--to=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).