From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pa0-f71.google.com (mail-pa0-f71.google.com [209.85.220.71]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA6ED6B0253 for ; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 18:20:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pa0-f71.google.com with SMTP id q2so82180135pap.1 for ; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 15:20:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org (mail.linuxfoundation.org. [140.211.169.12]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b6si114077pay.102.2016.07.11.15.20.17 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 11 Jul 2016 15:20:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 15:20:15 -0700 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm, vmscan: Give up balancing node for high order allocations earlier Message-Id: <20160711152015.e3be8be7702fb0ca4625040d@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <00ed01d1d1c8$fcb12ff0$f6138fd0$@alibaba-inc.com> References: <00ed01d1d1c8$fcb12ff0$f6138fd0$@alibaba-inc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Hillf Danton Cc: 'Mel Gorman' , 'Johannes Weiner' , 'Vlastimil Babka' , 'linux-kernel' , linux-mm@kvack.org On Wed, 29 Jun 2016 13:42:12 +0800 "Hillf Danton" wrote: > To avoid excessive reclaim, we give up rebalancing for high order > allocations right after reclaiming enough pages. hm. What are the observed runtime effects of this change? Any testing results? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org