From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: PINTU KUMAR <pintu.k@samsung.com>
Cc: 'Minchan Kim' <minchan@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
jaejoon.seo@samsung.com, jy0.jeon@samsung.com,
vishnu.ps@samsung.com
Subject: Re: [linux-mm] Drastic increase in application memory usage with Kernel version upgrade
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016 22:50:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160805205018.GE7999@amd> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <01c101d1ef28$50706ad0$f1514070$@samsung.com>
On Fri 2016-08-05 20:17:36, PINTU KUMAR wrote:
> Hi,
> > On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 10:26:37AM +0530, PINTU KUMAR wrote:
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > For one of our ARM embedded product, we recently updated the Kernel
> > > version from
> > > 3.4 to 3.18 and we noticed that the same application memory usage (PSS
> > > value) gone up by ~10% and for some cases it even crossed ~50%.
> > > There is no change in platform part. All platform component was built
> > > with ARM 32-bit toolchain.
> > > However, the Kernel is changed from 32-bit to 64-bit.
> > >
> > > Is upgrading Kernel version and moving from 32-bit to 64-bit is such a risk
> ?
> > > After the upgrade, what can we do further to reduce the application
> > > memory usage ?
> > > Is there any other factor that will help us to improve without major
> > > modifications in platform ?
> > >
> > > As a proof, we did a small experiment on our Ubuntu-32 bit machine.
> > > We upgraded Ubuntu Kernel version from 3.13 to 4.01 and we observed
> > > the
> > > following:
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > ----------
> > > -------------
> > > |UBUNTU-32 bit |Kernel 3.13 |Kernel 4.03 |DIFF |
> > > |CALCULATOR PSS |6057 KB |6466 KB |409 KB |
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > ----------
> > > -------------
> > > So, just by upgrading the Kernel version: PSS value for calculator is
> > > increased by 409KB.
> > >
> > > If anybody knows any in-sight about it please point out more details
> > > about the root cause.
> >
> > One of culprit is [8c6e50b0290c, mm: introduce vm_ops->map_pages()].
> Ok. Thank you for your reply.
> So, if I revert this patch, will the memory usage be decreased for the processes
> with Kernel 3.18 ?
I guess you should try it...
You may want to try the same kernel version, once in 32-bit and once
in 64-bit version. And you may consider moving to recent kernel.
Yes, 64-bit kernel will increase memory usage _of kernel_, but...
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-05 20:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20160805045709epcas3p1dc6f12f2fa3031112c4da5379e33b5e9@epcas3p1.samsung.com>
2016-08-05 4:56 ` [linux-mm] Drastic increase in application memory usage with Kernel version upgrade PINTU KUMAR
2016-08-05 8:20 ` Minchan Kim
2016-08-05 14:47 ` PINTU KUMAR
2016-08-05 20:50 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2016-08-10 13:26 ` PINTU KUMAR
2016-08-11 4:53 ` vinayak menon
2016-08-11 5:45 ` PINTU KUMAR
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160805205018.GE7999@amd \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=jaejoon.seo@samsung.com \
--cc=jy0.jeon@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=pintu.k@samsung.com \
--cc=vishnu.ps@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).