linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
Cc: Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"'Kirill A. Shutemov'" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
	Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
	Ebru Akagunduz <ebru.akagunduz@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] thp: reduce usage of huge zero page's atomic counter
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 15:50:21 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160829155021.2a85910c3d6b16a7f75ffccd@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b7e47f2c-8aac-156a-f627-a50db31220f8@intel.com>

On Mon, 29 Aug 2016 14:31:20 +0800 Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> wrote:

> 
> The global zero page is used to satisfy an anonymous read fault. If
> THP(Transparent HugePage) is enabled then the global huge zero page is used.
> The global huge zero page uses an atomic counter for reference counting
> and is allocated/freed dynamically according to its counter value.
> 
> CPU time spent on that counter will greatly increase if there are
> a lot of processes doing anonymous read faults. This patch proposes a
> way to reduce the access to the global counter so that the CPU load
> can be reduced accordingly.
> 
> To do this, a new flag of the mm_struct is introduced: MMF_USED_HUGE_ZERO_PAGE.
> With this flag, the process only need to touch the global counter in
> two cases:
> 1 The first time it uses the global huge zero page;
> 2 The time when mm_user of its mm_struct reaches zero.
> 
> Note that right now, the huge zero page is eligible to be freed as soon
> as its last use goes away.  With this patch, the page will not be
> eligible to be freed until the exit of the last process from which it
> was ever used.
> 
> And with the use of mm_user, the kthread is not eligible to use huge
> zero page either. Since no kthread is using huge zero page today, there
> is no difference after applying this patch. But if that is not desired,
> I can change it to when mm_count reaches zero.

I suppose we could simply never free the zero huge page - if some
process has used it in the past, others will probably use it in the
future.  One wonders how useful this optimization is...

But the patch is simple enough.

> Case used for test on Haswell EP:
> usemem -n 72 --readonly -j 0x200000 100G
> Which spawns 72 processes and each will mmap 100G anonymous space and
> then do read only access to that space sequentially with a step of 2MB.
> 
> perf report for base commit:
>     54.03%  usemem   [kernel.kallsyms]   [k] get_huge_zero_page
> perf report for this commit:
>      0.11%  usemem   [kernel.kallsyms]   [k] mm_get_huge_zero_page

Does this mean that overall usemem runtime halved?

Do we have any numbers for something which is more real-wordly?


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-08-29 22:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-29  6:31 [PATCH] thp: reduce usage of huge zero page's atomic counter Aaron Lu
2016-08-29  8:49 ` Anshuman Khandual
2016-08-29  8:53   ` Aaron Lu
2016-08-29 13:47     ` Anshuman Khandual
2016-08-29 14:10       ` Aaron Lu
2016-08-29 22:50 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2016-08-30  3:09   ` Aaron Lu
2016-08-30  3:39     ` Andrew Morton
2016-08-30  4:44       ` Anshuman Khandual
2016-08-30  4:56         ` Andrew Morton
2016-08-30  5:54         ` Aaron Lu
2016-08-30  6:47           ` Anshuman Khandual
2016-08-30  5:51       ` Aaron Lu
2016-08-30  5:14   ` Anshuman Khandual
2016-08-30  5:19     ` Andrew Morton
2016-08-30 15:59 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-08-31  2:08   ` [PATCH v2] " Aaron Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160829155021.2a85910c3d6b16a7f75ffccd@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=aaron.lu@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=ebru.akagunduz@gmail.com \
    --cc=jmarchan@redhat.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).