From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
Cc: Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"'Kirill A. Shutemov'" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
Ebru Akagunduz <ebru.akagunduz@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] thp: reduce usage of huge zero page's atomic counter
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 15:50:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160829155021.2a85910c3d6b16a7f75ffccd@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b7e47f2c-8aac-156a-f627-a50db31220f8@intel.com>
On Mon, 29 Aug 2016 14:31:20 +0800 Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> wrote:
>
> The global zero page is used to satisfy an anonymous read fault. If
> THP(Transparent HugePage) is enabled then the global huge zero page is used.
> The global huge zero page uses an atomic counter for reference counting
> and is allocated/freed dynamically according to its counter value.
>
> CPU time spent on that counter will greatly increase if there are
> a lot of processes doing anonymous read faults. This patch proposes a
> way to reduce the access to the global counter so that the CPU load
> can be reduced accordingly.
>
> To do this, a new flag of the mm_struct is introduced: MMF_USED_HUGE_ZERO_PAGE.
> With this flag, the process only need to touch the global counter in
> two cases:
> 1 The first time it uses the global huge zero page;
> 2 The time when mm_user of its mm_struct reaches zero.
>
> Note that right now, the huge zero page is eligible to be freed as soon
> as its last use goes away. With this patch, the page will not be
> eligible to be freed until the exit of the last process from which it
> was ever used.
>
> And with the use of mm_user, the kthread is not eligible to use huge
> zero page either. Since no kthread is using huge zero page today, there
> is no difference after applying this patch. But if that is not desired,
> I can change it to when mm_count reaches zero.
I suppose we could simply never free the zero huge page - if some
process has used it in the past, others will probably use it in the
future. One wonders how useful this optimization is...
But the patch is simple enough.
> Case used for test on Haswell EP:
> usemem -n 72 --readonly -j 0x200000 100G
> Which spawns 72 processes and each will mmap 100G anonymous space and
> then do read only access to that space sequentially with a step of 2MB.
>
> perf report for base commit:
> 54.03% usemem [kernel.kallsyms] [k] get_huge_zero_page
> perf report for this commit:
> 0.11% usemem [kernel.kallsyms] [k] mm_get_huge_zero_page
Does this mean that overall usemem runtime halved?
Do we have any numbers for something which is more real-wordly?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-29 22:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-29 6:31 [PATCH] thp: reduce usage of huge zero page's atomic counter Aaron Lu
2016-08-29 8:49 ` Anshuman Khandual
2016-08-29 8:53 ` Aaron Lu
2016-08-29 13:47 ` Anshuman Khandual
2016-08-29 14:10 ` Aaron Lu
2016-08-29 22:50 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2016-08-30 3:09 ` Aaron Lu
2016-08-30 3:39 ` Andrew Morton
2016-08-30 4:44 ` Anshuman Khandual
2016-08-30 4:56 ` Andrew Morton
2016-08-30 5:54 ` Aaron Lu
2016-08-30 6:47 ` Anshuman Khandual
2016-08-30 5:51 ` Aaron Lu
2016-08-30 5:14 ` Anshuman Khandual
2016-08-30 5:19 ` Andrew Morton
2016-08-30 15:59 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-08-31 2:08 ` [PATCH v2] " Aaron Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160829155021.2a85910c3d6b16a7f75ffccd@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=aaron.lu@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=ebru.akagunduz@gmail.com \
--cc=jmarchan@redhat.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).