linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Piotr Kwapulinski <kwapulinski.piotr@gmail.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com,
	vbabka@suse.cz, mhocko@kernel.org, mgorman@techsingularity.net,
	liangchen.linux@gmail.com, nzimmer@sgi.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/mempolicy.c: forbid static or relative flags for local NUMA mode
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 17:56:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160920155601.GB3899@home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1609191755060.53329@chino.kir.corp.google.com>

On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 05:57:17PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Sep 2016, Piotr Kwapulinski wrote:
> 
> > The MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES and MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES flags are irrelevant
> > when setting them for MPOL_LOCAL NUMA memory policy via set_mempolicy.
> > Return the "invalid argument" from set_mempolicy whenever
> > any of these flags is passed along with MPOL_LOCAL.
> > It is consistent with MPOL_PREFERRED passed with empty nodemask.
> > It also slightly shortens the execution time in paths where these flags
> > are used e.g. when trying to rebind the NUMA nodes for changes in
> > cgroups cpuset mems (mpol_rebind_preferred()) or when just printing
> > the mempolicy structure (/proc/PID/numa_maps).
> > Isolated tests done.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Piotr Kwapulinski <kwapulinski.piotr@gmail.com>
> 
> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
> 
> There wasn't an MPOL_LOCAL when I introduced either of these flags, it's 
> an oversight to allow them to be passed.
> 
> Want to try to update set_mempolicy(2) with the procedure outlined in 
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/patches.html as well?
Yes, why not ? I'll put a note about it.

--
Piotr Kwapulinski

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2016-09-20 15:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-18 11:29 [PATCH] mm/mempolicy.c: forbid static or relative flags for local NUMA mode Piotr Kwapulinski
2016-09-19 11:52 ` Michal Hocko
2016-09-20 15:47   ` Piotr Kwapulinski
2016-09-20  0:57 ` David Rientjes
2016-09-20 15:56   ` Piotr Kwapulinski [this message]
2016-09-20 20:05     ` David Rientjes
2016-09-27 13:19       ` [PATCH 0/1] man/set_mempolicy.2,mbind.2: add MPOL_LOCAL NUMA memory policy documentation Piotr Kwapulinski
2016-10-04  8:36         ` Christoph Lameter
2016-10-09 18:56           ` [PATCH v2 " Piotr Kwapulinski
2016-10-10 13:55             ` Christoph Lameter
2016-10-10 16:23               ` [PATCH v3 " Piotr Kwapulinski
2016-10-12  7:55                 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2016-10-12 14:08                   ` Christoph Lameter
2016-10-12 14:35                     ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2016-10-12 15:53                   ` Piotr Kwapulinski
2016-10-12 19:55                     ` Christoph Lameter
2016-10-13  6:48                       ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2016-09-27 13:22       ` [PATCH 1/1] mm/mempolicy.c: " Piotr Kwapulinski
2016-09-27 13:25       ` [PATCH v2 0/1] mm/mempolicy.c: forbid static or relative flags for local NUMA mode Piotr Kwapulinski
2016-10-27 16:30         ` [PATCH v3 " Piotr Kwapulinski
2016-11-01  0:21           ` David Rientjes
2016-09-27 13:27       ` [PATCH 1/1] man/set_mempolicy.2,mbind.2: " Piotr Kwapulinski
2016-09-20 15:12 ` [PATCH] mm/mempolicy.c: " Vlastimil Babka
2016-09-20 16:23   ` Piotr Kwapulinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160920155601.GB3899@home \
    --to=kwapulinski.piotr@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=liangchen.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=nzimmer@sgi.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).