linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: mgorman@techsingularity.net, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
	riel@redhat.com, tbsaunde@tbsaunde.org, robert@ocallahan.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: check VMA flags to avoid invalid PROT_NONE NUMA balancing
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2016 19:47:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160925184731.GA20480@lucifer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160911225425.10388-1-lstoakes@gmail.com>

Just a quick ping on this, let me know if you need anything more from me!

Thanks, Lorenzo

On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 11:54:25PM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> The NUMA balancing logic uses an arch-specific PROT_NONE page table flag defined
> by pte_protnone() or pmd_protnone() to mark PTEs or huge page PMDs respectively
> as requiring balancing upon a subsequent page fault. User-defined PROT_NONE
> memory regions which also have this flag set will not normally invoke the NUMA
> balancing code as do_page_fault() will send a segfault to the process before
> handle_mm_fault() is even called.
>
> However if access_remote_vm() is invoked to access a PROT_NONE region of memory,
> handle_mm_fault() is called via faultin_page() and __get_user_pages() without
> any access checks being performed, meaning the NUMA balancing logic is
> incorrectly invoked on a non-NUMA memory region.
>
> A simple means of triggering this problem is to access PROT_NONE mmap'd memory
> using /proc/self/mem which reliably results in the NUMA handling functions being
> invoked when CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING is set.
>
> This issue was reported in bugzilla (issue 99101) which includes some simple
> repro code.
>
> There are BUG_ON() checks in do_numa_page() and do_huge_pmd_numa_page() added at
> commit c0e7cad to avoid accidentally provoking strange behaviour by attempting
> to apply NUMA balancing to pages that are in fact PROT_NONE. The BUG_ON()'s are
> consistently triggered by the repro.
>
> This patch moves the PROT_NONE check into mm/memory.c rather than invoking
> BUG_ON() as faulting in these pages via faultin_page() is a valid reason for
> reaching the NUMA check with the PROT_NONE page table flag set and is therefore
> not always a bug.
>
> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99101
> Reported-by: Trevor Saunders <tbsaunde@tbsaunde.org>
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com>
> ---
>  mm/huge_memory.c |  3 ---
>  mm/memory.c      | 12 +++++++-----
>  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> index d76700d..954be55 100644
> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> @@ -1198,9 +1198,6 @@ int do_huge_pmd_numa_page(struct fault_env *fe, pmd_t pmd)
>  	bool was_writable;
>  	int flags = 0;
>
> -	/* A PROT_NONE fault should not end up here */
> -	BUG_ON(!(vma->vm_flags & (VM_READ | VM_EXEC | VM_WRITE)));
> -
>  	fe->ptl = pmd_lock(vma->vm_mm, fe->pmd);
>  	if (unlikely(!pmd_same(pmd, *fe->pmd)))
>  		goto out_unlock;
> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> index 020226b..aebc04f 100644
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -3351,9 +3351,6 @@ static int do_numa_page(struct fault_env *fe, pte_t pte)
>  	bool was_writable = pte_write(pte);
>  	int flags = 0;
>
> -	/* A PROT_NONE fault should not end up here */
> -	BUG_ON(!(vma->vm_flags & (VM_READ | VM_EXEC | VM_WRITE)));
> -
>  	/*
>  	* The "pte" at this point cannot be used safely without
>  	* validation through pte_unmap_same(). It's of NUMA type but
> @@ -3458,6 +3455,11 @@ static int wp_huge_pmd(struct fault_env *fe, pmd_t orig_pmd)
>  	return VM_FAULT_FALLBACK;
>  }
>
> +static inline bool vma_is_accessible(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> +{
> +	return vma->vm_flags & (VM_READ | VM_EXEC | VM_WRITE);
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * These routines also need to handle stuff like marking pages dirty
>   * and/or accessed for architectures that don't do it in hardware (most
> @@ -3524,7 +3526,7 @@ static int handle_pte_fault(struct fault_env *fe)
>  	if (!pte_present(entry))
>  		return do_swap_page(fe, entry);
>
> -	if (pte_protnone(entry))
> +	if (pte_protnone(entry) && vma_is_accessible(fe->vma))
>  		return do_numa_page(fe, entry);
>
>  	fe->ptl = pte_lockptr(fe->vma->vm_mm, fe->pmd);
> @@ -3590,7 +3592,7 @@ static int __handle_mm_fault(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
>
>  		barrier();
>  		if (pmd_trans_huge(orig_pmd) || pmd_devmap(orig_pmd)) {
> -			if (pmd_protnone(orig_pmd))
> +			if (pmd_protnone(orig_pmd) && vma_is_accessible(vma))
>  				return do_huge_pmd_numa_page(&fe, orig_pmd);
>
>  			if ((fe.flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE) &&
> --
> 2.9.3

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-09-25 18:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-11 22:54 [PATCH] mm: check VMA flags to avoid invalid PROT_NONE NUMA balancing Lorenzo Stoakes
2016-09-11 22:59 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2016-09-25 18:47 ` Lorenzo Stoakes [this message]
2016-09-25 20:52   ` Linus Torvalds
2016-09-25 22:24     ` Linus Torvalds
2016-09-25 22:34     ` Rik van Riel
2016-09-25 22:50       ` Linus Torvalds
2016-09-25 23:28         ` Hugh Dickins
2016-09-26  0:49         ` Rik van Riel
2016-09-26  1:05           ` Linus Torvalds
2016-10-07 10:07         ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2016-10-07 15:34           ` Linus Torvalds
2016-10-07 16:22             ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2016-10-07 18:16               ` Hugh Dickins
2016-10-07 18:26                 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2016-10-10  7:47                 ` Jan Kara
2016-10-10  8:28                   ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2016-10-10 16:37                     ` Jan Kara
2016-09-26  8:19 ` Mel Gorman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160925184731.GA20480@lucifer \
    --to=lstoakes@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=robert@ocallahan.org \
    --cc=tbsaunde@tbsaunde.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).