From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Sellami Abdelkader <abdelkader.sellami@sap.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] oom: print nodemask in the oom report
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2016 17:12:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161004151258.GD32214@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6fc2bb5f-a91c-f4e8-8d3c-029e2bdb3526@suse.cz>
On Tue 04-10-16 17:02:42, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 10/04/2016 04:16 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Tue 04-10-16 15:24:53, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> > > On 09/30/2016 11:41 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > Fix this by always priting the nodemask. It is either mempolicy mask
> > > > (and non-null) or the one defined by the cpusets.
> > >
> > > I wonder if it's helpful to print the cpuset one when that's printed
> > > separately, and seeing both pieces of information (nodemask and cpuset)
> > > unmodified might tell us more. Is it to make it easier to deal with NULL
> > > nodemask? Or to make sure the info gets through pr_warn() and not pr_info()?
> >
> > I am not sure I understand the question. I wanted to print the nodemask
> > separatelly in the same line with all other allocation request
> > parameters like order and gfp mask because that is what the page
> > allocator got (via policy_nodemask). cpusets builds on top - aka applies
> > __cpuset_zone_allowed on top of the nodemask. So imho it makes sense to
> > look at the cpuset as an allocation domain while the mempolicy as a
> > restriction within this domain.
> >
> > Does that answer your question?
>
> Ah, I wasn't clear. What I questioned is the fallback to cpusets for NULL
> nodemask:
>
> nodemask_t *nm = (oc->nodemask) ? oc->nodemask :
> &cpuset_current_mems_allowed;
Well no nodemask means there is no mempolicy so either all nodes can be
used or they are restricted by the cpuset. cpuset_current_mems_allowed is
node_states[N_MEMORY] if there is no cpuset so I believe we are printing
the correct information. An alternative would be either not print
anything if there is no nodemask or print node_states[N_MEMORY]
regardless the cpusets. The first one is quite ugly while the later
might be confusing I guess.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-04 15:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-30 21:41 [PATCH] oom: print nodemask in the oom report Michal Hocko
2016-10-04 13:24 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-10-04 14:16 ` Michal Hocko
2016-10-04 15:02 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-10-04 15:12 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2016-10-05 9:51 ` Vlastimil Babka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161004151258.GD32214@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=abdelkader.sellami@sap.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).