From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lf0-f72.google.com (mail-lf0-f72.google.com [209.85.215.72]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FE046B0038 for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2016 13:20:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-lf0-f72.google.com with SMTP id x23so43372554lfi.0 for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2016 10:20:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gum.cmpxchg.org (gum.cmpxchg.org. [85.214.110.215]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 81si18129847ljb.37.2016.10.10.10.20.49 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 10 Oct 2016 10:20:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 13:16:46 -0400 From: Johannes Weiner Subject: Re: [RFC 0/4] try to reduce fragmenting fallbacks Message-ID: <20161010171646.GA6281@cmpxchg.org> References: <20160928014148.GA21007@cmpxchg.org> <20160929210548.26196-1-vbabka@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160929210548.26196-1-vbabka@suse.cz> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Vlastimil Babka Cc: Mel Gorman , Joonsoo Kim , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, kernel-team@fb.com Hi Vlastimil, sorry for the delay, I just got back from traveling. On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 11:05:44PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > Hi Johannes, > > here's something quick to try or ponder about. However, untested since it's too > late here. Based on mmotm-2016-09-27-16-08 plus this fix [1] > > [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/ Thanks for whipping something up, I'll give these a shot. 4/4 is something I wondered about too. Let's see how this performs. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org